Hi!
Since we have next release planned on 20th, and since we have at least
three unsolved issues for 5.4 yet which we expect resolution soon:
- is_a question
- serialization changes
- date fixes
I think the release on 20th should be beta2 and we can start the RC
cycle once these are resolved. BTW, if anyone remembers anything else
that must be resolved before RC and isn't yet, please raise the flag.
Also, it'd be great if we could get some attention to the missing
documentation: https://wiki.php.net/todo/undoc54
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
I would also like to have some decision on
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54089 (there already was some
discussion about this @
internals@lists.php.net/msg53411.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg53411.html but
no consensus was reached).
Hi!
Since we have next release planned on 20th, and since we have at least three
unsolved issues for 5.4 yet which we expect resolution soon:
- is_a question
- serialization changes
- date fixes
I think the release on 20th should be beta2 and we can start the RC cycle
once these are resolved. BTW, if anyone remembers anything else that must be
resolved before RC and isn't yet, please raise the flag.Also, it'd be great if we could get some attention to the missing
documentation: https://wiki.php.net/todo/undoc54Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
Hi!
Since we have next release planned on 20th, and since we have at least three
unsolved issues for 5.4 yet which we expect resolution soon:
- is_a question
where is the question? You seem to be the only one to disagree with
the revert and the proposed patch. Rasmus and other agreed on it
already, here and the security list.
- serialization changes
BC break, it should be reverted.
- date fixes
Any ref or link on those please?
Cheers,
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Stas Malyshev smalyshev@sugarcrm.com
wrote:Hi!
Since we have next release planned on 20th, and since we have at least
three
unsolved issues for 5.4 yet which we expect resolution soon:
- is_a question
where is the question? You seem to be the only one to disagree with
the revert and the proposed patch. Rasmus and other agreed on it
already, here and the security list.
please keep in mind that the security is a closed group so most of the
readers don't know the discussion happening there, so maybe it would be a
good idea to summarize the discussion here and maybe mention who are exactly
Rasmus and other.
- serialization changes
BC break, it should be reverted.
see internals@lists.php.net/msg53939.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg53939.html
- date fixes
Any ref or link on those please?
see internals@lists.php.net/msg53940.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg53940.html
imo the date related XFAILS should be fixed before 5.4
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
where is the question? You seem to be the only one to disagree with
the revert and the proposed patch. Rasmus and other agreed on it
already, here and the security list.please keep in mind that the security is a closed group so most of the
readers don't know the discussion happening there, so maybe it would be a
good idea to summarize the discussion here
Right, all the details have been already published on this list:
http://news.php.net/php.internals/55816
Cheers,
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
Hi!
where is the question? You seem to be the only one to disagree with
the revert and the proposed patch. Rasmus and other agreed on it
already, here and the security list.
The patch is still not applied. If nobody agrees with me - ok, apply it
then. But this is a substantial change so I don't want to do it in RC
phase.
- serialization changes
BC break, it should be reverted.
Should be, but isn't yet. Michael says he has a fix for it.
- date fixes
Any ref or link on those please?
All Date XFAILs, pretty much. If you intend to help Derick and Daniel
look into it, I can give you more info (it was already discussed, but I
don't want to spend time summarizing it unless it's needed).
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
Hi,
2011/10/18 Stas Malyshev smalyshev@sugarcrm.com:
Hi!
Since we have next release planned on 20th, and since we have at least three
unsolved issues for 5.4 yet which we expect resolution soon:
- is_a question
- serialization changes
- date fixes
I think the release on 20th should be beta2 and we can start the RC cycle
once these are resolved. BTW, if anyone remembers anything else that must be
resolved before RC and isn't yet, please raise the flag.Also, it'd be great if we could get some attention to the missing
documentation: https://wiki.php.net/todo/undoc54Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227--
What about https://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call?
--
Regards,
Felipe Pena
Hi!
What about https://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call?
I'm not sure what would be the use case for that... But if people need
it, and there's no objections, I don't see any danger in including it.
If we do, we need tests though!
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227