Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55870 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72994 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2011 10:20:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Oct 2011 10:20:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.170 mail-gx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.170] ([209.85.161.170:50801] helo=mail-gx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 15/60-04838-554AE9E4 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:20:06 -0400 Received: by ggnk5 with SMTP id k5so1736921ggn.29 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:20:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=iTNysdbyfm9nGOKVozDqgHpiryS74dpPTFqiW68kVK0=; b=Ub2DTcjS3dlnQT/C+rtkp2jS21W5K0olqAt7uOncS6CWj59O6dSDKbPbYAHl7gfOfl ztCYhw7x7o8cRhOcgnyNNtmhRlcc7Skfky5mhtQlJDRoxk5rG4oPdPi+04I3raOeSaS2 z5vMY5uYq9UEeU3SqfOjibzHGdCvqOLy595Lg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.135.66 with SMTP id t42mr3481328yhi.31.1319019602937; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.170.17 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:20:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E9DBF7A.5050808@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ferenc Kovacs Cc: Stas Malyshev , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.4 next iteration From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: >> where is the question? You seem to be the only one to disagree with >> the revert and the proposed patch. Rasmus and other agreed on it >> already, here and the security list. > > please keep in mind that the security is a closed group so most of the > readers don't know the discussion happening there, so maybe it would be a > good idea to summarize the discussion here Right, all the details have been already published on this list: http://news.php.net/php.internals/55816 Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org