Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55862 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96650 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2011 20:15:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Oct 2011 20:15:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.203 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.203 smtp203.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.97.245.203] ([207.97.245.203:33588] helo=smtp203.iad.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 14/A5-46813-D4EDD9E4 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:15:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp30.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6142C20627; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:15:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp30.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id F3C7420629; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:15:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E9DDE48.5060900@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:15:04 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: PHP Internals References: <4E9DBF7A.5050808@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.4 next iteration From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 10/18/11 12:36 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > where is the question? You seem to be the only one to disagree with > the revert and the proposed patch. Rasmus and other agreed on it > already, here and the security list. The patch is still not applied. If nobody agrees with me - ok, apply it then. But this is a substantial change so I don't want to do it in RC phase. >> - serialization changes > > BC break, it should be reverted. Should be, but isn't yet. Michael says he has a fix for it. >> - date fixes > > Any ref or link on those please? All Date XFAILs, pretty much. If you intend to help Derick and Daniel look into it, I can give you more info (it was already discussed, but I don't want to spend time summarizing it unless it's needed). -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227