Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55859 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90490 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2011 19:36:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Oct 2011 19:36:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:49193] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D5/94-46813-A45DD9E4 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:36:42 -0400 Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5so1073521gyd.29 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:36:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VMj6y7yzXrXeJqUwKBsnLFkIRWKO9a1OFvDJgr1mAgM=; b=loYfaQ9wBs1H7tlsFV38lWp0HafZZyVOBvTfE/1CfBhjRQudaq9jG/UPRuuaQ1kbTr Xzr7fDwbz9NR3a6tYBSZphi8l8PN0Z+8O8YWN0XZtSIkzQ66Iy8xNYAIvK0IJQZyMmg/ TTsoulfSBpQRXrO3H5BEM+JUJGjvbaSa+lMm0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.116.98 with SMTP id f62mr5741067yhh.48.1318966599700; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.170.17 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:36:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E9DBF7A.5050808@sugarcrm.com> References: <4E9DBF7A.5050808@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:36:39 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.4 next iteration From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > Since we have next release planned on 20th, and since we have at least three > unsolved issues for 5.4 yet which we expect resolution soon: > - is_a question where is the question? You seem to be the only one to disagree with the revert and the proposed patch. Rasmus and other agreed on it already, here and the security list. > - serialization changes BC break, it should be reverted. > - date fixes Any ref or link on those please? Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org