Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:55880 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54550 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2011 07:24:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Oct 2011 07:24:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.143 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.143 smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.143] ([67.192.241.143:37283] helo=smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D4/62-34776-F2E11AE4 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 03:24:32 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 216E83A07FC; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 03:24:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp4.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id D81553A0816; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 03:24:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4EA11E2C.3080906@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:24:28 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felipe Pena CC: PHP Internals References: <4E9DBF7A.5050808@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] php 5.4 next iteration From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! On 10/19/11 3:23 AM, Felipe Pena wrote: > What about https://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call? I'm not sure what would be the use case for that... But if people need it, and there's no objections, I don't see any danger in including it. If we do, we need tests though! -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227