Hi internals!
This RFC proposes to remove the type-restrictions on Iterator keys used in
foreach:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreach-non-scalar-keys
I took over Levi's RFC and added a patch for it.
Thoughts?
Nikita
This RFC proposes to remove the type-restrictions on Iterator keys
used in foreach:https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreach-non-scalar-keys
I took over Levi's RFC and added a patch for it.
Under "Open Questions" you write:
What should be done with the keys that are valid in the iterator, but not in
the array? I think the best approach would be to just set the array keys with
the exact same semantics as PHP would do (i.e. with all casts and warnings).
Would __toString be called in case the key was an object?
cheers,
Derick
--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
Posted with an email client that doesn't mangle email: alpine
This RFC proposes to remove the type-restrictions on Iterator keys
used in foreach:https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreach-non-scalar-keys
I took over Levi's RFC and added a patch for it.
Under "Open Questions" you write:
What should be done with the keys that are valid in the iterator, but
not in
the array? I think the best approach would be to just set the array keys
with
the exact same semantics as PHP would do (i.e. with all casts and
warnings).Would __toString be called in case the key was an object?
Current behavior of PHP can be found here:
http://lxr.php.net/xref/PHP_TRUNK/Zend/zend_execute.c#996 So if one goes
with that approach, then no, __toString won't be called, it'll throw a "*
Warning*: Illegal offset type" and not set the key. Don't know whether
that's good or bad ^^
Nikita
I think the warning can stay as-is, __toString is not necessarily available
so casting to string in all occasions is probably not what we want.
I'm glad somebody could take this over and provide a complete patch, thanks
Nikita!
This RFC proposes to remove the type-restrictions on Iterator keys
used in foreach:https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreach-non-scalar-keys
I took over Levi's RFC and added a patch for it.
Under "Open Questions" you write:
What should be done with the keys that are valid in the iterator, but
not in
the array? I think the best approach would be to just set the array keys
with
the exact same semantics as PHP would do (i.e. with all casts and
warnings).Would __toString be called in case the key was an object?
cheers,
Derick--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
Posted with an email client that doesn't mangle email: alpine--
--
Etienne Kneuss
http://www.colder.ch
Gah, no top posting!
This RFC proposes to remove the type-restrictions on Iterator keys
used in foreach:https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreach-non-scalar-keys
I took over Levi's RFC and added a patch for it.
Under "Open Questions" you write:
What should be done with the keys that are valid in the iterator,
but not in the array? I think the best approach would be to just
set the array keys with the exact same semantics as PHP would do
(i.e. with all casts and warnings).Would __toString be called in case the key was an object?
I think the warning can stay as-is, __toString is not necessarily
available so casting to string in all occasions is probably not what
we want.
I think it should cast to a string if possible. You are now making
iterator_to_array not work with the new feature, and I find that a bit
silly. Whether it should be __toString (or __toKey) I don't really care,
but this new support for objects should be supported everywhere (and
that includes iterator_to_array).
cheers,
Derick
Gah, no top posting!
This RFC proposes to remove the type-restrictions on Iterator keys
used in foreach:https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreach-non-scalar-keys
I took over Levi's RFC and added a patch for it.
Under "Open Questions" you write:
What should be done with the keys that are valid in the iterator,
but not in the array? I think the best approach would be to just
set the array keys with the exact same semantics as PHP would do
(i.e. with all casts and warnings).Would __toString be called in case the key was an object?
I think the warning can stay as-is, __toString is not necessarily
available so casting to string in all occasions is probably not what
we want.I think it should cast to a string if possible. You are now making
iterator_to_array not work with the new feature, and I find that a bit
silly. Whether it should be __toString (or __toKey) I don't really care,
but this new support for objects should be supported everywhere (and
that includes iterator_to_array).
I think this RFC is orthogonal to iterator_to_array supporting conversions
from objects to keys.
$array[$obj] = 42; does not call __toString (or __toKey), it throws a
catchable fatal. IMO it would be inconsistent if iterator_to_array
gracefully accepted objects as keys.
I think the warning can stay as-is, __toString is not necessarily
available so casting to string in all occasions is probably not what
we want.I think it should cast to a string if possible. You are now making
iterator_to_array not work with the new feature, and I find that a bit
silly. Whether it should be __toString (or __toKey) I don't really care,
but this new support for objects should be supported everywhere (and
that includes iterator_to_array).I think this RFC is orthogonal to iterator_to_array supporting conversions
from objects to keys.$array[$obj] = 42; does not call __toString (or __toKey), it throws a
catchable fatal. IMO it would be inconsistent if iterator_to_array
gracefully accepted objects as keys.
Personally I think the real problem here is that iterator_to_array
should not copy keys by default. However, what's done is done and we
need to thoughtfully consider this situation.
You already CAN return objects from an iterator; you just can't use it
in a foreach. If you try to use that iterator in iteator_to_array
you get a lovely warning:
Warning: Illegal type returned from %s::key() in %s on line %d
I'm all for not changing that behavior; if they want it ignore keys
then they can pass false
as a second parameter to
iterator_to_array
.
Gah, no top posting!
This RFC proposes to remove the type-restrictions on Iterator keys
used in foreach:https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreach-non-scalar-keys
I took over Levi's RFC and added a patch for it.
Under "Open Questions" you write:
What should be done with the keys that are valid in the iterator,
but not in the array? I think the best approach would be to just
set the array keys with the exact same semantics as PHP would do
(i.e. with all casts and warnings).Would __toString be called in case the key was an object?
I think the warning can stay as-is, __toString is not necessarily
available so casting to string in all occasions is probably not what
we want.I think it should cast to a string if possible. You are now making
iterator_to_array not work with the new feature, and I find that a bit
silly. Whether it should be __toString (or __toKey) I don't really care,
but this new support for objects should be supported everywhere (and
that includes iterator_to_array).I think this RFC is orthogonal to iterator_to_array supporting conversions
from objects to keys.$array[$obj] = 42; does not call __toString (or __toKey), it throws a
catchable fatal. IMO it would be inconsistent if iterator_to_array
gracefully accepted objects as keys.
I updated the patch to use the usual array assignment behavior. I.e. the
behavior will be the same as the following code:
function iterator_to_array($iter) {
foreach ($iter as $k => $v) {
$array[$k] = $v;
}
return $array;
}
I think it's reasonable to expect that the code will behave this way.
If there are no objections I'd like to vote on this already on February
28th or March 1st. It is a few days shy of the 2 week discussion period,
but I'd like to have this in 5.5 and the beta is tagged on the 7th already
:)
Nikita