Hi,
What is the proper way to express support for an item that's not an
official part of an RFC but is listed as an idea for future
consideration? Specifically I wanted to give my "+1" for covariant
return types which are mentioned in passing in this RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/return_types.
While I could create a new issue for this in the bug database and see if
anyone else expresses support as well, I'm guessing that's not the
correct thing to do. Perhaps just this message is sufficient and reaches
the relevant audience.
Thanks,
Matt
Hi,
What is the proper way to express support for an item that's not an
official part of an RFC but is listed as an idea for future
consideration? Specifically I wanted to give my "+1" for covariant
return types which are mentioned in passing in this RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/return_types.
I think you'd go ahead and create an RFC for it :)
Hi,
What is the proper way to express support for an item that's not an
official part of an RFC but is listed as an idea for future
consideration? Specifically I wanted to give my "+1" for covariant
return types which are mentioned in passing in this RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/return_types.I think you'd go ahead and create an RFC for it :)
In this particular instance, it may be more to the point to create an
implementation of it.
The reason it was omitted was not for lack of desire, but due to
practical problems of how to make it work. See for instance
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=142791636808421&w=2
Regards,
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]