Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:93947 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45397 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2016 21:30:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jun 2016 21:30:25 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([127.0.0.1:15796]) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ECSTREAM id 37/40-39978-0F52F575 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:30:24 -0400 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mbrowne83@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mbrowne83@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mbrowne83@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.170 mail-qk0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.170] ([209.85.220.170:34097] helo=mail-qk0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5B/60-12403-4DC4D575 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 07:51:49 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id s186so58095713qkc.1 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 04:51:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=83OOrE/P421Y7HlS0qJvTksATIKfsR1qoPfRB0htOek=; b=ReB6Cd6u28z7w3DaI0+7M6njVQJA7ekp19FSETruO2yQpmKYxnOn4fpNhu2FdbulNv 3cZlHCJiyEG2CCM1JwNUAeXJSxbtD3k94NO3q23ato/UtKqqpd/QRC6Q5El/pw+mdu+Q IbWXEMP6GDIb5DvDmsgCYAyuvoVWNDizs3Wf5VcEGFtw+xMSqsUbhP2vSJ7XzKw9x+5z I0FOyH9YKlQc/zvxJEZ0kI0VILwN0CaUv1Qr/5/1V+MZM3LXTRuEC5P+auTP1EMe0zE9 CXbl4pjXw6Pgx66AAKzyA0mlZ1QvP7y6zpNUe7YmH4FPkzUQ9R/z7Qlh1h8KcVxh2CF5 eBSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=83OOrE/P421Y7HlS0qJvTksATIKfsR1qoPfRB0htOek=; b=BjZ4HMXM4ZDNk9qN2wb5uYlNi+4JENBzuHJ9zgweUFOP3IiGvaJ99ZfB3Bk8Cf84+C lHu6byY/goRejahg1eDlioWpyW6Pgk0mZ1BFh+toFTTLqbvJkP4SIVFPr4CphNM6sJA/ 1s1W3F7koFLyyfJjVJRuoN6AJhAH9laGKQTsTn2tKkUgwP+H8oxIaQgdS/dP4bJGNuNT flxefH4VDjEXHTjgo6i+3ZvXAhCPYDc0nK8vFAUfRdd8BdM6agAbxHaGSHkWL2D8jTy3 thljw2Bssxn+rq7EOydbeMNpiEZ3gO3cyjDG5qy2YNBWjIvTD+UArhTdcGewSmMsm6LS P9dg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJWp9MOGZXw4qqMJC8UJsCHx2CdqZhDkYWnH6aAj4bdoyHLQiWZ+fXJ1EfjM98/AQ== X-Received: by 10.55.120.196 with SMTP id t187mr9479410qkc.6.1465732306539; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 04:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Matthews-MacBook-Pro.local (cpe-74-73-85-53.nyc.res.rr.com. [74.73.85.53]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n188sm5536551qkc.43.2016.06.12.04.51.45 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 12 Jun 2016 04:51:45 -0700 (PDT) To: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 07:51:45 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How to indicate support for unimplemented part of an RFC From: mbrowne83@gmail.com (Matthew Browne) Hi, What is the proper way to express support for an item that's not an official part of an RFC but is listed as an idea for future consideration? Specifically I wanted to give my "+1" for covariant return types which are mentioned in passing in this RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/return_types. While I could create a new issue for this in the bug database and see if anyone else expresses support as well, I'm guessing that's not the correct thing to do. Perhaps just this message is sufficient and reaches the relevant audience. Thanks, Matt