Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:93971
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 36691 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2016 19:11:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jun 2016 19:11:26 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.51 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.51 mail-lf0-f51.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.51] ([209.85.215.51:36082] helo=mail-lf0-f51.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 74/C1-27860-ED650675 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:11:26 -0400
Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id q132so72785777lfe.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=7gIX2p9EeU0UIz/RTWA0HNb6uEKt00THcOs6k8yKOms=;
        b=E/t1P83HVf2rhDeBc0pQpWrDAv5AWNpIrA7RCP1uVBHJ84f+TTeWNLUHpejSr2q+du
         IJrpow5gOpmAD16Em8bSjn67ps+e4DzgpoISrl1TTVDu1EbD9WyO0MU8wQli5LO9wV7o
         sbm3r1PMoxXPfsWLEqaUz1fjSm8jMV9hkN9nQf9XhgTHZhe7gGee6eMfWQdAD+ZxUYGI
         CJ0VrKqFLnTOr5dQejpNqhFfklXUJenFrDF0b8ViySkWngKJkP+Bh+q2kEyGY7O+iIF8
         awNGVqqP0+UwCkKN7T5KCHLeQ/pboX0jml4qdmG8u+7yaY5UjUo3MGBucjC9fzcDLW0G
         fDAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=7gIX2p9EeU0UIz/RTWA0HNb6uEKt00THcOs6k8yKOms=;
        b=XVaZnXC2bddpADAH1eB8rVt18iQM1iDgxhPtvY/RE0nqRXy5kMNU1aWoYPteDuaB8l
         vzMtnFeUVfyfpBKTc9taXfTekWwOkGtFQG11WjiMZZZntfaUwXdd1uiDdN+8FCUc7YgY
         hZEhW4q1n2r7oEH8Ma9VshAE8uPpeyof+vsY4OxTdA0IcuLZp4nTW9r5g5PSkO8wPnEj
         QUNUdtFOWC74zPxRTnO0Byi8d8Rdbgfry3/DNH73zQFz9eLjoon5ij2SiVClLyCS0CEm
         FIVP7/RKE7N3HPt44SKt+Vjhd0h0t9fAz/6RXwyjaATDDi8li26b4IcC1NzamwQrsYkZ
         cBqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLuk05IFcCyT1zxubZTjA7Y5DY0FB8oGS7qWYTndm/ioph2wCB7AUk7u3IXg9C+yPGUGbJcGrUkEx0qCA==
X-Received: by 10.25.148.77 with SMTP id w74mr1894181lfd.2.1465931483405; Tue,
 14 Jun 2016 12:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <c0c3d6fc-e240-634d-f934-b6b56063badb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c0c3d6fc-e240-634d-f934-b6b56063badb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:11:13 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocHu86Wz_epapWq5r_3jAHv8Q76CUB9unU9TLG=25YEBcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Browne <mbrowne83@gmail.com>, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11401668556206053541c542
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] How to indicate support for unimplemented part of an RFC
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

--001a11401668556206053541c542
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 at 22:30 Matthew Browne <mbrowne83@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> What is the proper way to express support for an item that's not an
> official part of an RFC but is listed as an idea for future
> consideration? Specifically I wanted to give my "+1" for covariant
> return types which are mentioned in passing in this RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/return_types.


I think you'd go ahead and create an RFC for it :)

--001a11401668556206053541c542--