Dear Internals,
I am tentatively opening the vote on this RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reserve_more_types_in_php_7
It's a bit tentative because I would prefer to wait until the vote on
Anthony's RFC closes tomorrow as there is some overlap in the type
names reserved. However, I am unsure if I am allowed to wait one more
day, as today is March 15th.
In any case, voting is now open.
Cheers,
Levi Morrison
Dear Internals,
I am tentatively opening the vote on this RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reserve_more_types_in_php_7It's a bit tentative because I would prefer to wait until the vote on
Anthony's RFC closes tomorrow as there is some overlap in the type
names reserved. However, I am unsure if I am allowed to wait one more
day, as today is March 15th.In any case, voting is now open.
Cheers,
Levi Morrison
Thanks Levi, I'm glad the aliases were removed, this was the point of
contention for me.
Dear Internals,
I am tentatively opening the vote on this RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reserve_more_types_in_php_7It's a bit tentative because I would prefer to wait until the vote on
Anthony's RFC closes tomorrow as there is some overlap in the type
names reserved. However, I am unsure if I am allowed to wait one more
day, as today is March 15th.In any case, voting is now open.
Cheers,
Levi Morrison
Thanks Levi, I'm glad the aliases were removed, this was the point of
contention for me.
When opening the vote I did not decide when the vote would close.
Unless I hear from someone specifically requesting a longer period, I
will close this RFC on Friday, March 27th sometime in the evening
(UTC-7).
Le 22/03/2015 23:28, Levi Morrison a écrit :
When opening the vote I did not decide when the vote would close.
Unless I hear from someone specifically requesting a longer period, I
will close this RFC on Friday, March 27th sometime in the evening
(UTC-7).
Hi,
It seems I'm a bit late (I didn't see the end date before, so I just
supposed it was 29/03, like for a few other RFCs for which votes started
on 16/03), sorry.
Still, at AFUP, we would have been +1.
Even if this proposition causes some bc-breaks (and some are already
there, because of STH), a new major version is the right time for this
-- and those bc-breaks should not be the hardest ones to fix.
Thanks!
--
Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG
http://php-internals.afup.org/