Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:85525 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35517 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2015 12:05:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Mar 2015 12:05:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mailing@pascal-martin.fr; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mailing@pascal-martin.fr; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain pascal-martin.fr designates 91.121.85.26 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mailing@pascal-martin.fr X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.121.85.26 ns362529.ip-91-121-85.eu Received: from [91.121.85.26] ([91.121.85.26:54281] helo=pascal-martin.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D4/00-34966-C9AE7155 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 07:05:48 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (home.squalenet.net [82.225.233.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pascal-martin.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53346E0BDF for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 14:05:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5517EA98.60207@pascal-martin.fr> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 14:05:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Reserve More Type Names in PHP 7 From: mailing@pascal-martin.fr ("Pascal Martin, AFUP") Le 22/03/2015 23:28, Levi Morrison a écrit : > When opening the vote I did not decide when the vote would close. > Unless I hear from someone specifically requesting a longer period, I > will close this RFC on Friday, March 27th sometime in the evening > (UTC-7). Hi, It seems I'm a bit late (I didn't see the end date before, so I just supposed it was 29/03, like for a few other RFCs for which votes started on 16/03), sorry. Still, at AFUP, we would have been +1. Even if this proposition causes some bc-breaks (and some are already there, because of STH), a new major version is the right time for this -- and those bc-breaks should not be the hardest ones to fix. Thanks! -- Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG http://php-internals.afup.org/