[vote] power operator (again)

11 years ago by Tjerk Meesters — view source — reply

unread

Hi again,

Due to my own stupidity I have now restarted the poll with a bumped version
of 0.2 which includes a non-associative voting option:

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pow-operator#vote

The new deadline is set at the 5th of Jan 2015.

Again, my apologies for the screw up and have a great Christmas ahead :)

Best,
Tjerk

11 years ago by Kris Craig — view source — reply

unread

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Tjerk Meesters
tjerk.meesters@gmail.comwrote:

Hi again,

Due to my own stupidity I have now restarted the poll with a bumped version
of 0.2 which includes a non-associative voting option:

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pow-operator#vote

The new deadline is set at the 5th of Jan 2015.

Again, my apologies for the screw up and have a great Christmas ahead :)

Best,
Tjerk

Thanks for all your effort! Unfortunately, since there's no option for
negative numbers to intuitively square to positive outcomes, my vote is
still No. I understand and respect your reasoning even though I do not
agree with it.

--Kris

11 years ago by Mike — view source — reply

unread

Thanks for all your effort! Unfortunately, since there's no option for
negative numbers to intuitively square to positive outcomes, my vote is
still No. I understand and respect your reasoning even though I do not
agree with it.

Why are you actually allowed to vote (without regard to your actual
vote)?

What is actually our policy about who is allowed to vote on RFCs? Don't
we have rules of action for everything nowadays? Is a simple php.net
account really sufficient to be able to vote something in or out of the
future of PHP? There are surely people who do not have an account who
would be more eligible to vote on RFCs than someone who "just" obtained
one.

Anally,
Mike

--
Regards,
Mike

11 years ago by Pierre Joye — view source — reply

unread

Why are you actually allowed to vote (without regard to your actual
vote)?

He has contributed more tests and did more QA work than many of us. He was
part of my team as well for a couple of years.

Can you stay on topic please?

Cheers,
Pierre

11 years ago by Peter Cowburn — view source — reply

unread

Hi again,

Due to my own stupidity I have now restarted the poll with a bumped version
of 0.2 which includes a non-associative voting option:

Would it be possible to keep a record of the now-abandoned vote question
and its votes, just for historical interest?

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pow-operator#vote

The new deadline is set at the 5th of Jan 2015.

Again, my apologies for the screw up and have a great Christmas ahead :)

Best,
Tjerk