Morning Internalz,
The vote is open for the phpdbg RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpdbg#vote
Cheers
Joe
Hi!
The vote is open for the phpdbg RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpdbg#vote
One question: the RFC says:
Note: it would be nice if 5.5 could get phpdbg too, but requires a patch
that might cause ABI incompatibiilty issues caused by new exports.
Could you describe which change is needed for it?
Unfortunately, commit referred to in "Changes to PHP" doesn't actually
show anything.
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Stas Malyshev smalyshev@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
The vote is open for the phpdbg RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpdbg#vote
One question: the RFC says:
Note: it would be nice if 5.5 could get phpdbg too, but requires a patch
that might cause ABI incompatibiilty issues caused by new exports.Could you describe which change is needed for it?
Unfortunately, commit referred to in "Changes to PHP" doesn't actually
show anything.Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227--
Hi Stas,
I think this was it:
http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commit;h=1a1e83a5d9a8c5cd30465ad83e92821e1cbf231c
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Stas Malyshev smalyshev@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
The vote is open for the phpdbg RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpdbg#vote
One question: the RFC says:
Note: it would be nice if 5.5 could get phpdbg too, but requires a patch
that might cause ABI incompatibiilty issues caused by new exports.Could you describe which change is needed for it?
Unfortunately, commit referred to in "Changes to PHP" doesn't actually
show anything.Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227--
Hi Stas,
I think this was it:
http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commit;h=1a1e83a5d9a8c5cd30465ad83e92821e1cbf231c
Evening chaps,
Yeah, that was the one, thanks Tyrael ... it's a trivial change, but
I'm unsure of the rules on ABI compatibility, or if this changes it to
be honest, someone said that it might and that could be a problem.
It would be very nice to have 5.5 support, there is no reason not to
support it other than these exports, and in fact, the patch is only
required because of Windows, nix/bsd/darwin are fine ...
Cheers
Joe