Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70597 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86198 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2013 00:41:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Dec 2013 00:41:39 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.4.21.210 cpc22-asfd3-2-0-cust209.1-2.cable.virginm.net Received: from [80.4.21.210] ([80.4.21.210:9903] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1D/19-22966-14609A25 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:41:38 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net,Ferenc Kovacs Message-ID: <52A9063E.3000403@php.net> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:41:34 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <52A8E654.40202@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 80.4.21.210 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC]: phpdbg From: krakjoe@php.net (Joe Watkins) On 12/11/2013 10:38 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > >> Hi! >> >>> The vote is open for the phpdbg RFC: >>> >>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpdbg#vote >> >> One question: the RFC says: >> >> Note: it would be nice if 5.5 could get phpdbg too, but requires a patch >> that might cause ABI incompatibiilty issues caused by new exports. >> >> Could you describe which change is needed for it? >> Unfortunately, commit referred to in "Changes to PHP" doesn't actually >> show anything. >> -- >> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect >> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ >> (408)454-6900 ext. 227 >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > Hi Stas, > > I think this was it: > http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commit;h=1a1e83a5d9a8c5cd30465ad83e92821e1cbf231c > Evening chaps, Yeah, that was the one, thanks Tyrael ... it's a trivial change, but I'm unsure of the rules on ABI compatibility, or if this changes it to be honest, someone said that it might and that could be a problem. It would be very nice to have 5.5 support, there is no reason not to support it other than these exports, and in fact, the patch is only required because of Windows, nix/bsd/darwin are fine ... Cheers Joe