Not sure if the date is significant, but just received notification that 1&1
will drop support for PHP4 and PHP5.2 from April 1, 2013 - yes PHP4 is still
available as their default!
The move is to PHP5.4, but the interesting thing is that they are calling it
PHP6 simply to isolate it from PHP5.2
http://faq.1and1.co.uk/scripting/php/5.html
I keep being told that 'It's just a number', but this is an example of why
rolling yet another significantly different version of PHP5 causes problems in
user land. The frameworks are jumping to the next major release to support 5.4
over 5.2 and providers like 1&1 need an easy way to manage what they PROVIDE to
users.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
What a great way to confuse people.
Not sure if the date is significant, but just received notification that
1&1 will drop support for PHP4 and PHP5.2 from April 1, 2013 - yes PHP4 is
still available as their default!The move is to PHP5.4, but the interesting thing is that they are calling
it PHP6 simply to isolate it from PHP5.2
http://faq.1and1.co.uk/**scripting/php/5.htmlhttp://faq.1and1.co.uk/scripting/php/5.htmlI keep being told that 'It's just a number', but this is an example of why
rolling yet another significantly different version of PHP5 causes problems
in user land. The frameworks are jumping to the next major release to
support 5.4 over 5.2 and providers like 1&1 need an easy way to manage what
they PROVIDE to users.--
Lester Caine - G8HFLContact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=**contacthttp://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.**uk<http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
April 1, 2013
The date is somewhat suspicious ;)
The move is to PHP5.4, but the interesting thing is that they are
calling it
PHP6 simply to isolate it from PHP5.2
http://faq.1and1.co.uk/scripting/php/5.html
well, the actual reason is that they offered the old PHP 6 before as
experimental and then simply swapped that for 5.3 back in the days and
since then have been lazy.
I keep being told that 'It's just a number', but this is an example of
why rolling yet another significantly different version of PHP5 causes
problems in user land. The frameworks are jumping to the next major
release to support 5.4 over 5.2 and providers like 1&1 need an easy
way to manage what they PROVIDE to users.
So how does a string matter? - We might also call it PHP 98 or PHP 2000
or PHP XP or whatever. What's the difference? Only that peopleare more
afraid.
Having difference between minor versions isn't new i.e. PHP 4.4 broke
many things due to the fixes in the reference handling there. Compared
to that the breakage between 5.2 and 5.3 or 5.3 and 5.4 is small. It is
especially small when comparing it with PHP 3 to PHP 4 (complete
reimplementation, changed behavior of include/require etc.) and PHP 4 to
PHP 5 (redone OO model, changing objects from being value types to
reference types)
johannes
Lester, are you seriously suggesting we coddle providers who either
[a] Willfully misrepresent the PHP versioning system, showing they are
utterly tuned out of the PHP support community?
or
[b] Play unfunny practical jokes on their users and/or troll this very
list?
If anything, their behavior is a call for some official censure, IMO.
I have sympathy for their users, but the only cure for that is to find
a responsible provider.
If providers just told the truth about the "whys" of what they
support, instead of lying about stability, security, or other
"boldface" reasons, users would be better served. One such reason: "We
should have done this long ago, but held off longer than necessary for
budget reasons. Now, we're behind the curve and can't get new
customers who are version-aware. You'll enjoy the performance rewards
of re/building for the new version."
-- Sandy
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Lester, are you seriously suggesting we coddle providers who either
[a] Willfully misrepresent the PHP versioning system, showing they are
utterly tuned out of the PHP support community?
Well they are only one of the ISP's who have been posting PHP6 as their next
supported version, and been waiting for it to appear. These are the people who
have to support naive users who are NOT in a position to re-write code just to
make it work with later versions of PHP5, and needing to still run PHP5.2 in
parallel with PHP5.4 is not the easiest thing to do on shared hosting?
But I was posting it so that people will not be surprised when 'php6' starts
appearing in bug reports where users have changed and now need help to fix the
problems. I stopped using 1&1's versions of PHP a number of years ago, switching
to my own machines with them simply so I could control versions but I can quite
understand why they have not switched away from PHP5.2 and they are now
providing PHP5.4 as a selectable option, but which HAS to co-exist with their
existing working infrastructure! How else could this situation be handled?
I'm lead to believe that the date was chosen simply because they do consider the
situation a bit of a joke ...
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
I'm lead to believe that the date was chosen simply because they do consider
the situation a bit of a joke ...
Speaking as a current and long-time customer of 1and1 hosting, I do
believe that their business situation is a bit of a joke. I know this
is not a list to talk about various hosting providers, but I'll just
say I won't be doing business with them for much longer. This is just
another point of feedback I can give to them when I do change service.
Incorrectly reporting your service offering regardless of what type of
business you run is a really poor decision.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Levi Morrison morrison.levi@gmail.comwrote:
I'm lead to believe that the date was chosen simply because they do
consider
the situation a bit of a joke ...Speaking as a current and long-time customer of 1and1 hosting, I do
believe that their business situation is a bit of a joke. I know this
is not a list to talk about various hosting providers, but I'll just
say I won't be doing business with them for much longer. This is just
another point of feedback I can give to them when I do change service.
Incorrectly reporting your service offering regardless of what type of
business you run is a really poor decision.--
I think we should do what Microsoft does with Windows and just pull version
names out of a hat. We could call 5.5 "PHP XP" and 5.6 "PHP Vista". A
separate branch with slightly more features could be called "PHP Vista
Ultimate" and hosting providers could use a custom-branded one called "PHP
Vista Ultimate for Workgroups." We could release 6.0 right now with tons
of bugs and call it "PHP Derp," then a few months later put out 6.1 as "PHP
7." The goal should be to confuse the hell out of our users as much as
possible. Step 1: Confuse users. Step 3: Profit.
Seriously, though, 1and1 is a joke. That's not exactly breaking news. If
it really bugs us that much, we could always put up a statement on the
website rebuking their misrepresentation of our version numbering and leak
it to a few tech blogs. Otherwise, it's probably best to just laugh it off
and move on.
--Kris
Seriously, though, 1and1 is a joke. That's not exactly breaking news. If
it really bugs us that much, we could always put up a statement on the
website rebuking their misrepresentation of our version numbering and leak
it to a few tech blogs. Otherwise, it's probably best to just laugh it off
and move on.
I had a rant about it on Twitter yesterday, and will probably use it
as the punchline for a joke in a conference talk next month. That's
probably about the level of disgust, er... recognition it deserves.
Adam
Seriously, though, 1and1 is a joke. That's not exactly breaking news.
If
it really bugs us that much, we could always put up a statement on the
website rebuking their misrepresentation of our version numbering and
leak
it to a few tech blogs. Otherwise, it's probably best to just laugh it
off
and move on.I had a rant about it on Twitter yesterday, and will probably use it
as the punchline for a joke in a conference talk next month. That's
probably about the level of disgust, er... recognition it deserves.I like the idea :-)
Julien