Whats the status of 5.3? I have some changes that need to get into a
couple of the xml based extensions in order for them to work with the
next libxml2 release next month. Should I be putting these into 5.3 as well?
Rob
Whats the status of 5.3? I have some changes that need to get into a couple
of the xml based extensions in order for them to work with the next libxml2
release next month. Should I be putting these into 5.3 as well?Rob
By no means am I an official representative, but I'd like to see them
NOT put into the 5.3 series. Security fixes I can understand, but we
WANT people to upgrade. If we keep developing 5.3 then what's the
point of 5.4 and 5.5?
Levi
Whats the status of 5.3? I have some changes that need to get into a couple
of the xml based extensions in order for them to work with the next libxml2
release next month. Should I be putting these into 5.3 as well?Rob
By no means am I an official representative, but I'd like to see them
NOT put into the 5.3 series. Security fixes I can understand, but we
WANT people to upgrade. If we keep developing 5.3 then what's the
point of 5.4 and 5.5?
Until we EOL 5.3 we should make sure it builds against current versions
of common things like libxml2. We also don't have APC ready for all the
new features in 5.4, so it isn't viable to upgrade to it yet for many sites.
-Rasmus
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Whats the status of 5.3? I have some changes that need to get into a couple
of the xml based extensions in order for them to work with the next libxml2
release next month. Should I be putting these into 5.3 as well?Rob
By no means am I an official representative, but I'd like to see them
NOT put into the 5.3 series. Security fixes I can understand, but we
WANT people to upgrade. If we keep developing 5.3 then what's the
point of 5.4 and 5.5?
Until we EOL 5.3 we should make sure it builds against current versions
of common things like libxml2. We also don't have APC ready for all the
new features in 5.4, so it isn't viable to upgrade to it yet for many sites.
Not just APC ... It would be useful to document all the extensions that are
still only available in PHP5.3 ( or earlier )...
There seems to be a number of reasons ISP's are giving for not offering PHP5.4
yet but getting a definitive answer seems impossible.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Rob
Richardsrrichards@cdatazone.org wrote:Whats the status of 5.3? I have some changes that need to get into
a couple
of the xml based extensions in order for them to work with the
next libxml2
release next month. Should I be putting these into 5.3 as well?Rob
By no means am I an official representative, but I'd like to see them
NOT put into the 5.3 series. Security fixes I can understand, but we
WANT people to upgrade. If we keep developing 5.3 then what's the
point of 5.4 and 5.5?
Until we EOL 5.3 we should make sure it builds against current versions
of common things like libxml2. We also don't have APC ready for all the
new features in 5.4, so it isn't viable to upgrade to it yet for many
sites.Not just APC ... It would be useful to document all the extensions that
are still only available in PHP5.3 ( or earlier )...There seems to be a number of reasons ISP's are giving for not offering
PHP5.4 yet but getting a definitive answer seems impossible.
There is no such answer. When we find an extension that hasn't been
fixed for 5.4 yet, we fix it. Outside of APC which is on a completely
different level, modifying extensions to work with 5.4 is trivial.
-Rasmus
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Rob
Richardsrrichards@cdatazone.org wrote:Whats the status of 5.3? I have some changes that need to get into
a couple
of the xml based extensions in order for them to work with the
next libxml2
release next month. Should I be putting these into 5.3 as well?Rob
By no means am I an official representative, but I'd like to see them
NOT put into the 5.3 series. Security fixes I can understand, but we
WANT people to upgrade. If we keep developing 5.3 then what's the
point of 5.4 and 5.5?
Until we EOL 5.3 we should make sure it builds against current versions
of common things like libxml2. We also don't have APC ready for all the
new features in 5.4, so it isn't viable to upgrade to it yet for many
sites.
Not just APC ... It would be useful to document all the extensions that
are still only available in PHP5.3 ( or earlier )...There seems to be a number of reasons ISP's are giving for not offering
PHP5.4 yet but getting a definitive answer seems impossible.
There is no such answer. When we find an extension that hasn't been
fixed for 5.4 yet, we fix it. Outside of APC which is on a completely
different level, modifying extensions to work with 5.4 is trivial.-Rasmus
Thanks. Committed then. Can someone do me a favor and make sure that the
commit went properly. Just got my env setup for first time for the repo
and to top it off git client hung on me during the push but I think it
made it ok
Rob