[PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /win32 time.c

Hi,

It is my understanding that most of the Win95 users are developing on the
win platform and deploying on a server (Win or Linux). I have no idea of
how meny users we have on Win95, but I have no problem in removing support
for it in PHP5. Lets move on :-)

• Frank

I'm not sure if we should whole-heartedly abandon win95; I'd love to,
I'm just not sure. CGI/FastCGI sapi will only run under NT and later
(because of the named pipe stuff). For the people running PHP in a
web server, this shouldn't be a problem (who would be mad enough to
run '95 as a server anyway? ;-)

I think the question is how many people use php under 95? (for gtk?)
Do we need to support win95 in PHP 5?

My preference is to say good riddance to it, as doing so allows us
to implement these missing features and catch up with the unix version.

--Wez.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andi Gutmans" andi@zend.com
To: "Wez Furlong" wez@php.net
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:23 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /win32 time.c

Does this mean I can enable my GetLongPathName() patch in
tsrm_virtual_cwd.c (I think it also requires Win98 but I kept it out
because there are people who are still using Windows 95). I think we
decided that we will continue supporting Windows 95 and I #If 0'd my
patch.
Also, I just saw (and fixed the indentation) of some realpath()
implementation in tsrm_win32.c. Any reason for me not to nuke it? I
think
my code is better or is it being used throughout PHP? If so, we
should
probably use something similar to my implementation using
GetLongPathName().

Thoughts?
Andi

At 10:59 PM 11/29/2003 +0000, Wez Furlong wrote:

wez Sat Nov 29 17:59:34 2003 EDT

Modified files:
/php-src/win32 time.c
Log:
Fix build for new usleep implementation.
NB: we now depend on windows 98 and later;
windows 95 does not have these timing functions.