Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:5950
Return-Path: <frank@kromann.info>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 49435 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Dec 2003 21:44:07 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 49401 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 21:44:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.kromann.info) (64.186.239.125)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 21:44:07 -0000
Received: from Swwwing2000 (unknown [64.186.239.115])
	by mail.kromann.info (Postfix) with SMTP
	id ACA5C2AE70; Mon,  1 Dec 2003 14:01:38 -0800 (PST)
To: Wez Furlong <wez@thebrainroom.com>
Cc: <internals@lists.php.net>, Wez Furlong <wez@php.net>,
	Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>
X-Mailer: Swwwing 2000
Message-ID: <10703149724920000@9866357972520000.9866341568840000>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: "Frank M. Kromann" <frank@kromann.info>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:42:52 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /win32 time.c
From: frank@kromann.info ("Frank M. Kromann")

Hi,

It is my understanding that most of the Win95 users are developing on the
win platform and deploying on a server (Win or Linux). I have no idea of
how meny users we have on Win95, but I have no problem in removing support
for it in PHP5. Lets move on :-)

- Frank

> I'm not sure if we should whole-heartedly abandon win95; I'd love to,
> I'm just not sure.  CGI/FastCGI sapi will only run under NT and later
> (because of the named pipe stuff).  For the people running PHP in a
> web server, this shouldn't be a problem (who would be mad enough to
> run '95 as a server anyway? ;-)
> 
> I think the question is how many people use php under 95? (for gtk?)
> Do we *need* to support win95 in PHP 5?
> 
> My preference is to say good riddance to it, as doing so allows us
> to implement these missing features and catch up with the unix version.
> 
> --Wez.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com>
> To: "Wez Furlong" <wez@php.net>
> Cc: <internals@lists.php.net>
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:23 PM
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /win32 time.c
> 
> 
> > Does this mean I can enable my GetLongPathName() patch in
> > tsrm_virtual_cwd.c (I think it also requires Win98 but I kept it out
> > because there are people who are still using Windows 95). I think we
> > decided that we will continue supporting Windows 95 and I #If 0'd my
> patch.
> > Also, I just saw (and fixed the indentation) of some realpath()
> > implementation in tsrm_win32.c. Any reason for me not to nuke it? I
think
> > my code is better or is it being used throughout PHP? If so, we
should
> > probably use something similar to my implementation using
> GetLongPathName().
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > Andi
> >
> > At 10:59 PM 11/29/2003 +0000, Wez Furlong wrote:
> > >wez             Sat Nov 29 17:59:34 2003 EDT
> > >
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     /php-src/win32      time.c
> > >   Log:
> > >   Fix build for new usleep implementation.
> > >   NB: we now depend on windows 98 and later;
> > >   windows 95 does not have these timing functions.
> 
> -- 
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>