Hi,
The gcov.php.net machine is about to die. Nexcess (the owner) already
offered us the possibility to get a replacement.
However, before accepting their offer I would like to know if someone is
still using the gcov.php.net service. Is it still useful for anyone?
A new machine means installing everything from scratch, and that means
installing and configuring dozens of libraries and daemons (PHP has dozens
of extensions!).
So, is it worth it?
Thanks,
Nuno
Hi!
The gcov.php.net machine is about to die. Nexcess (the owner) already
offered us the possibility to get a replacement.
However, before accepting their offer I would like to know if someone is
still using the gcov.php.net service. Is it still useful for anyone?
I think test coverage, valgrind and failures report are useful,
especially that we're nearing 5.4 release. The latter probably we could
also get from QA reports, but others probably not - like coverage,
valgrind, parameters etc. reports.
BTW parameters report needs to be updated - it doesn't know about new
'p' parameter.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
2011/7/18 Stas Malyshev smalyshev@sugarcrm.com:
Hi!
The gcov.php.net machine is about to die. Nexcess (the owner) already
offered us the possibility to get a replacement.
However, before accepting their offer I would like to know if someone is
still using the gcov.php.net service. Is it still useful for anyone?I think test coverage, valgrind and failures report are useful, especially
that we're nearing 5.4 release. The latter probably we could also get from
QA reports, but others probably not - like coverage, valgrind, parameters
etc. reports.BTW parameters report needs to be updated - it doesn't know about new 'p'
parameter.
It already was updated, but wasn't synced with svn.
And I used to read the test failures and valgrind logs on gcov as well.
--
Regards,
Felipe Pena
The gcov.php.net machine is about to die. Nexcess (the owner) already
offered us the possibility to get a replacement.
However, before accepting their offer I would like to know if someone is
still using the gcov.php.net service. Is it still useful for anyone?I think test coverage, valgrind and failures report are useful, especially
that we're nearing 5.4 release. The latter probably we could also get from
QA reports, but others probably not - like coverage, valgrind, parameters
etc. reports.BTW parameters report needs to be updated - it doesn't know about new 'p'
parameter.
Ok, ok, I'm convinced.
This means that the gcov service will be down for a few days, but then it
will hopefully come back with a faster server, thanks to Nexcess!
Nuno
Hi,
So, is it worth it?
Speaking as a organizer of PHP TestFest events i think GCOV is one of
our most used tools to figure out what needs testing, all of our test
writers need this resource to look into this.
--
Rafael Dohms
PHP Evangelist and Community Leader
http://www.rafaeldohms.com.br
http://www.phpsp.org.br
I didn't know about gcov until a couple days ago, but just poking around I
think its fairly useful, if nothing else to see where potential
vulnerabilities may lie, as well as a quick, convenient way to check out the
internal code.
Thanks,
Mike
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Rafael Dohms listas@rafaeldohms.com.brwrote:
Hi,
So, is it worth it?
Speaking as a organizer of PHP TestFest events i think GCOV is one of
our most used tools to figure out what needs testing, all of our test
writers need this resource to look into this.--
Rafael Dohms
PHP Evangelist and Community Leader
http://www.rafaeldohms.com.br
http://www.phpsp.org.br--
--
"My command is this: Love each other as I
have loved you." John 15:12
Hi,
The gcov.php.net machine is about to die. Nexcess (the owner) already offered us the possibility to get a replacement.
However, before accepting their offer I would like to know if someone is still using the gcov.php.net service. Is it still useful for anyone?A new machine means installing everything from scratch, and that means installing and configuring dozens of libraries and daemons (PHP has dozens of extensions!).
So, is it worth it?Thanks,
Nuno
I find the output useful. It would be retrogressive for a project not to
run its own tests.
Chris
--
Email: christopher.jones@oracle.com
Tel: +1 650 506 8630
Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/