Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:54064 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80379 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2011 23:32:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jul 2011 23:32:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.133 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.133 smtp133.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.97.245.133] ([207.97.245.133:54207] helo=smtp133.iad.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 52/14-57459-072C42E4 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:32:02 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp53.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A20675828D; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:31:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp53.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 416AA5836F; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:31:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E24C26D.7040409@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:31:57 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nuno Lopes CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] is gcov.php.net still useful? From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > The gcov.php.net machine is about to die. Nexcess (the owner) already > offered us the possibility to get a replacement. > However, before accepting their offer I would like to know if someone is > still using the gcov.php.net service. Is it still useful for anyone? I think test coverage, valgrind and failures report are useful, especially that we're nearing 5.4 release. The latter probably we could also get from QA reports, but others probably not - like coverage, valgrind, parameters etc. reports. BTW parameters report needs to be updated - it doesn't know about new 'p' parameter. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227