Right, so, if this is still considered experimental, then we should
fix it in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the
configure script.
Which one will it be? :)
- Tul
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: #45687 [Opn->Bgs]: Why is PCNTL marked experimental
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:41:32 GMT
From: jani@php.net
To: php-bugs@lists.php.net
Newsgroups: php.bugs
Followup-To: php.internals
References: bug-45687@bugs.php.net
ID: 45687
Updated by: jani@php.net
Reported By: robert at shilston dot com
-Status: Open
+Status: Bogus
Bug Type: PCNTL related
Operating System: Fedora 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5
PHP Version: 5.2.6
New Comment:
This is not a discussion forum, ask your question on the
internals@lists.php.net mailing list.
Previous Comments:
[2008-08-02 13:11:45] robert at shilston dot com
Description:
I note that in configure script for 5.2.6, PCNTL is marked as
experimental. However, this isn't reflected in the online
documentation. Can anyone shed any light on whether PCNTL is stable,
and if not, what the outstanding concerns might be?
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=45687&edit=1
hi,
Right, so, if this is still considered experimental, then we should fix it
in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the configure script.Which one will it be? :)
Please use the bug report to reply. If it is a documentation problem,
then change the category (or anyone who can change it).
--
Pierre
hi,
Right, so, if this is still considered experimental, then we should fix it
in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the configure script.Which one will it be? :)
Please use the bug report to reply. If it is a documentation problem,
then change the category (or anyone who can change it).
I think Jani is right. This should be "discussed" here.
Is the extension experimental or not?
Bundling an experimental extension for 6 years is silly.
Either move it to PECL or mark it as "stable" (or whatever the
opposite of experimental is).
-Hannes
Bundling an experimental extension for 6 years is silly.
Either move it to PECL or mark it as "stable" (or whatever the
opposite of experimental is).
Keeping the experimental status for so many years is a nonsense.
Apparently it's not experimental anymore.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
Antony Dovgal wrote:
Keeping the experimental status for so many years is a nonsense.
Apparently it's not experimental anymore.
It has been working for me for years. I would say it is not experimental.
--
Brian Moon
Senior Web Engineer
When you care enough to spend the very least.
http://dealnews.com/
Right, so, if this is still considered experimental, then we
should fix it in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix
the configure script.Which one will it be? :)
so i guess it should get rid of the exerimental flag .. at least
nobody said it shouldnt, and brian and tony said it should ..
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
mls@pooteeweet.org
Right, so, if this is still considered experimental, then we should
fix it in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the
configure script.
Fixed (removed the experimental status).
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal