# [Fwd: #45687 [Opn->Bgs]: Why is PCNTL marked experimental]

- Thread: https://externals.io/message/39557
- Original archive: https://news-web.php.net/php.internals/39557
- Started by Maciek Sokolewicz on 2008-08-02T17:03:59+00:00
- Messages: 7
- Reply by email to internals@lists.php.net
- More for agents: search with https://externals.io/search.md?q={query} · JSON API at https://externals.io/api · documentation at https://externals.io/llms.txt

---

## #39557 — Maciek Sokolewicz — 2008-08-02T17:03:59+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/39557#39557

Right, so, if this _is_ still considered experimental, then we should 
fix it in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the 
configure script.

Which one will it be? :)

- Tul

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: #45687 [Opn->Bgs]: Why is PCNTL marked experimental
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:41:32 GMT
From: jani@php.net
To: php-bugs@lists.php.net
Newsgroups: php.bugs
Followup-To: php.internals
References: <bug-45687@bugs.php.net>

  ID:               45687
  Updated by:       jani@php.net
  Reported By:      robert at shilston dot com
-Status:           Open
+Status:           Bogus
  Bug Type:         PCNTL related
  Operating System: Fedora 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5
  PHP Version:      5.2.6
  New Comment:

This is not a discussion forum, ask your question on the
internals@lists.php.net mailing list.


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2008-08-02 13:11:45] robert at shilston dot com

Description:
------------
I note that in configure script for 5.2.6, PCNTL is marked as
experimental.  However, this isn't reflected in the online
documentation.  Can anyone shed any light on whether PCNTL is stable,
and if not, what the outstanding concerns might be?



------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=45687&edit=1

---

## #39558 — Pierre Joye — 2008-08-02T17:19:26+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/39557#39558 · In reply to: #39557

hi,


> Right, so, if this _is_ still considered experimental, then we should fix it
> in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the configure script.
>
> Which one will it be? :)

Please use the bug report to reply. If it is a documentation problem,
then change the category (or anyone who can change it).


-- 
Pierre

http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

---

## #39562 — Hannes Magnusson — 2008-08-02T22:25:26+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/39557#39562 · In reply to: #39558

> hi,
>
> 
> > […]
>
> Please use the bug report to reply. If it is a documentation problem,
> then change the category (or anyone who can change it).

I think Jani is right. This should be "discussed" here.
Is the extension experimental or not?

Bundling an experimental extension for 6 years is silly.
Either move it to PECL or mark it as "stable" (or whatever the
opposite of experimental is).

-Hannes

---

## #39582 — Antony Dovgal — 2008-08-03T22:30:21+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/39557#39582 · In reply to: #39562

> Bundling an experimental extension for 6 years is silly.
> Either move it to PECL or mark it as "stable" (or whatever the
> opposite of experimental is).

Keeping the experimental status for so many years is a nonsense.
Apparently it's not experimental anymore.

-- 
Wbr, 
Antony Dovgal

---

## #39583 — Brian Moon — 2008-08-03T22:40:15+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/39557#39583 · In reply to: #39582

Antony Dovgal wrote:
> Keeping the experimental status for so many years is a nonsense.
> Apparently it's not experimental anymore.

It has been working for me for years.  I would say it is not experimental.

-- 

Brian Moon
Senior Web Engineer
------------------------------
When you care enough to spend the very least.
http://dealnews.com/

---

## #39710 — Lukas Kahwe Smith — 2008-08-06T18:20:07+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/39557#39710 · In reply to: #39557

> Right, so, if this _is_ still considered experimental, then we  
> should fix it in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix  
> the configure script.
>
> Which one will it be? :)


so i guess it should get rid of the exerimental flag .. at least  
nobody said it shouldnt, and brian and tony said it should ..

regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
mls@pooteeweet.org

---

## #39733 — Antony Dovgal — 2008-08-07T13:11:53+00:00

URL: https://externals.io/message/39557#39733 · In reply to: #39557

> Right, so, if this _is_ still considered experimental, then we should 
> fix it in the documentation; and if it's not, we should fix the 
> configure script.

Fixed (removed the experimental status).

-- 
Wbr, 
Antony Dovgal
