Hi,
It seems that nobody cares about the aggregation bug. I know someone can
avoid using aggregation by proxy calls or even method duplication like
what I'm doing now. But what I'm warrying about is that what if it is a
zend hash bug. It might affect some other places at expected moments and
thus costing a lot of time of many people.
If so, don't say I didn't warn you. :)
Wei He
At 18:26 22.05.2003, Wei He wrote:
Hi,
It seems that nobody cares about the aggregation bug. I know someone can
avoid using aggregation by proxy calls or even method duplication like
what I'm doing now. But what I'm warrying about is that what if it is a
zend hash bug. It might affect some other places at expected moments and
thus costing a lot of time of many people.
aggregation is still to be considered, whether it makes it into ze2 or be
dropped
or fixed or replaced by other oo goodies. (So far there was no final
decision from
zend).
marcus
At 08:31 PM 5/22/2003 +0200, Marcus Börger wrote:
At 18:26 22.05.2003, Wei He wrote:
Hi,
It seems that nobody cares about the aggregation bug. I know someone can
avoid using aggregation by proxy calls or even method duplication like
what I'm doing now. But what I'm warrying about is that what if it is a
zend hash bug. It might affect some other places at expected moments and
thus costing a lot of time of many people.aggregation is still to be considered, whether it makes it into ze2 or be
dropped
or fixed or replaced by other oo goodies. (So far there was no final
decision from
zend).
I remember agreeing that interfaces is going to be the aggregation
alternative at the language level.
If people want to build on top of this outside of Zend, although I'm not
sure it's a good idea, this can be done.
Andi