Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:1908 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35168 invoked from network); 22 May 2003 19:00:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.zend.com) (192.117.235.230) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 May 2003 19:00:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 6243 invoked from network); 22 May 2003 19:00:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO andi-laptop.zend.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 May 2003 19:00:23 -0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20030522215935.06c2ef30@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: andi@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 22:00:38 +0300 To: marcus.boerger@post.rwth-aachen.de,Wei He Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20030522203023.02e9ac18@pop.t-online.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Nobody cares about the aggregation bug? From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) At 08:31 PM 5/22/2003 +0200, Marcus B=F6rger wrote: >At 18:26 22.05.2003, Wei He wrote: >>Hi, >> >>It seems that nobody cares about the aggregation bug. I know someone can >>avoid using aggregation by proxy calls or even method duplication like >>what I'm doing now. But what I'm warrying about is that what if it is a >>zend hash bug. It might affect some other places at expected moments and >>thus costing a lot of time of many people. > > >aggregation is still to be considered, whether it makes it into ze2 or be= =20 >dropped >or fixed or replaced by other oo goodies. (So far there was no final=20 >decision from >zend). I remember agreeing that interfaces is going to be the aggregation=20 alternative at the language level. If people want to build on top of this outside of Zend, although I'm not=20 sure it's a good idea, this can be done. Andi