Hi
we just started the vote the the "Support Closures in constant
expressions" RFC. Please find the following resources for your
reference:
RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures_in_const_expr
Implementation: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/16458
Discussion: https://externals.io/message/125872
The vote will end in two weeks, on November, 27th 2024 at 14:00 UTC.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Hi
Am 2024-11-13 14:40, schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
we just started the vote the the "Support Closures in constant
expressions" RFC. Please find the following resources for your
reference:RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures_in_const_expr
Implementation: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/16458
Discussion: https://externals.io/message/125872The vote will end in two weeks, on November, 27th 2024 at 14:00 UTC.
Voting just closed. The RFC was accepted unanimously with 19 (Yes) to 0
(No) votes. Thank you for your participation.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Hi
Am 2024-11-13 14:40, schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
we just started the vote the the "Support Closures in constant
expressions" RFC. Please find the following resources for your
reference:RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures_in_const_expr
Implementation: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/16458
Discussion: https://externals.io/message/125872The vote will end in two weeks, on November, 27th 2024 at 14:00 UTC.
Voting just closed. The RFC was accepted unanimously with 19 (Yes) to
0 (No) votes. Thank you for your participation.Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Congrats on the passed RFC! Sounds like a useful feature.
One thing I'm wondering about - and of which I saw no mention in the RFC
nor in the preceding discussion - knowing that function names are
case-insensitive, how is ambiguity handled when calling a callback
stored in a (class) constant ?
Consider the following code sample:
const STRTOUPPER = static function (string $text): string {
return $text !== '' ? \strtoupper($text) : '';
};
STRTOUPPER('test'); // What will this do ? Call the PHP native function
or the closure ?
And what about this one ?
class Foo {
public const STRTOUPPER = static function (string $text): string {
return $text !== '' ? \strtoupper($text) : '';
};
public function strtoupper(string $text) {
return \ucfirst($text);
}
public function test() {
self::STRTOUPPER('test'); // What will this do ?
}
}
Foo::STRTOUPPER('test'); // What will this do ?
Curious for your reply.
Smile,
Juliette
Hi
One thing I'm wondering about - and of which I saw no mention in the RFC
nor in the preceding discussion - knowing that function names are
case-insensitive, how is ambiguity handled when calling a callback
stored in a (class) constant ?
Nothing changed about the grammar or the way a PHP program is parsed
into Opcodes. As mentioned in the RFC it does not include any backwards
incompatible changes, except for making some illegal PHP programs legal.
In fact you are already able to store Closures in dynamic constants
defined with the define()
function (https://3v4l.org/u7ZJ1).
In any case that means that all your examples are interpreted as
function calls. You need parentheses around the constant name to
"dereference" the value stored in the constant. This is consistent with
$obj->foo() always being a method call to the foo() method, not a call
to a Closure stored in a property called $foo.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Hi
One thing I'm wondering about - and of which I saw no mention in the RFC
nor in the preceding discussion - knowing that function names are
case-insensitive, how is ambiguity handled when calling a callback
stored in a (class) constant ?Nothing changed about the grammar or the way a PHP program is parsed
into Opcodes. As mentioned in the RFC it does not include any
backwards incompatible changes, except for making some illegal PHP
programs legal.In fact you are already able to store Closures in dynamic constants
defined with thedefine()
function (https://3v4l.org/u7ZJ1).In any case that means that all your examples are interpreted as
function calls. You need parentheses around the constant name to
"dereference" the value stored in the constant. This is consistent
with $obj->foo() always being a method call to the foo() method, not a
call to a Closure stored in a property called $foo.Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Thanks for the clarification. Might be good to mention this in the
documentation eventually.