[RFC][Under discussion] Create a global login system for php.net View as Markdown

When you have feedback to a specific point of the RFC, please use the corresponding number used in the RFC.

To point 1, there was a time I was thinking about implementing a system
ourselves (I was working on website prototypes at the time).

That being said, as you identified creating our own system requires
resources we don't have, and PHP is bad at infrastructure (lack of
resources / specialists).

For that reason I think the sensible thing to do would be to use Github.

1.2 Type of global login system
It would be great if Github could be used for the global login.

I started to work on PHP several months ago. For a new developer, I felt the most frustrating thing was I could not login the different systems of PHP with one account. I understand that PHP is a long-history project. And moving to a modern infrastructure needs lots of effort. I think that creating a global login system is definitely a good beginning.

Thanks,
-Steven
在 2022年5月28日 +0800 PM5:53，Aaron Junker aaron.junker@outlook.com，写道：

Hey All.

Hi all,

I would like to start the discussion on my RFC for creating a global login system on php.net: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/global_login.

When you have feedback to a specific point of the RFC, please use the corresponding number used in the RFC.

I do have my issues with the general RFC.

The idea to have one login system to all parts of the PHP internals
ecosystem seems tempting for sure. But as you pointed out in the
introduction, there are 9 different services - partly rather old ones -
that would require some work to make SSO work. Some of them we have
control over, some of them we do not (as those are external applications
that we are using. Fiddling with their sourcecode might be possible but
will leave us more or less unable to update the tools)

So moving those applications that we have control over towards SSO will
bind resources. And not only now, but also in the future as those tools
might need updates as well.

Resources though, espechialy for infrastructure, are a very rare good!

In addition I would say that we can assume the edit.php.net to be dead
after we moved documentation from SVN to git. So that is awesome as that
means "one down" and we couldn't already find someone to modify
edit.php.net to work with git instead of SVN. So that's great news!

But the bad news is, that there is also the colobus system which powers
the NNTP-server backend that a number of people use to interact with the
mailing-list. Which also has an authentication and would therefore need
to be switched. So we are back at 9 services. And we switched one that
is completely under our control to one that isn't as we are merely using
a (rather old by now) service.

And there might even be more than those.

So what I'm trying to bring across here is that this task will bind a
lot of resources with a gain that I'm not sure is worth the effort. And
instead of binding people working on resources that improve the life of
a few (those working on these quirky systems) I'd rather see those
resources spent where they improve the life of all PHP-Developers. Like
improving the docs, triaging bugs, answering questions on
StackOverflow/Room11/PHPC/Whatever else there is.

In addition to that I would like to raise my concerns over using GitHub
login for everything (Topic 1.2).

GitHub is a company based in the US and therefore bound to US law. That
already means that people from certain countries can not (easily)
collaborate and are therefore also excluded from contributing in any way
to PHP[1]. In addition to those regulations directly by GitHub some
countries are blocking access to GitHub on their own account which means
that Developers from Russia or China will have a harder time
contributing to PHP due to the fact that they are not able to login into
any system.

Are we aware of that?

On the other hand maintaining our own SSO-Solution will bind even more
resources... See above.

In addition: The number of different logins is usually rather small per
person. And keeping track of the different systems and passwords via a
PasswordManager should solve most of the day-to-day hassle. Having a
central place though to document the hassle would be a very helpful
addition to the PHP ecosystem!

My 0.02€

Cheers

Andreas - The one having struggled for some years with just one
infra-change.

[1]
https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/other-site-policies/github-and-trade-controls#on-which-countries-and-territories-are-us-government-sanctions-applied

Best regards
Aaron Junker

--
,,,
(o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl |
| mailto:andreas@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| https://andreas.heigl.org |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

Hi all,

I've edited my RFC[1], so it now contains a note that edit.php.net is currently not in a usable state.

Besides that, I didn't find any big points that could have been added to the RFC.

So, unless a big new discussion starts, I will open votes this Saturday. 

But I have two questions:

1. What kind of majority in votes will this RFC need to get accepted? 
2. Am I allowed to vote on my own RFC? 

Best regards 
Aaron Junker 

[1] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/global_login