Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:117882 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1785 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2022 20:17:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 8 Jun 2022 20:17:44 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA7D1801FD for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 15:03:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NEUTRAL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS30827 82.113.144.0/20 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from xdebug.org (xdebug.org [82.113.146.227]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 15:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [85.255.234.221]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7A0710C055; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 23:03:47 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 23:03:45 +0100 To: internals@lists.php.net, Aaron Junker , PHP internals User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7E6AB598-9678-4EE3-AC43-2676A0EB7545@php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5BPHP-DEV=5D_Re=3A_=5BRFC=5D=5BUnder_discussion=5D?= =?US-ASCII?Q?_Create_a_global_login_system_for_php=2Enet?= From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On 8 June 2022 20:22:46 BST, Aaron Junker wr= ote: >Hi all, > >I've edited my RFC[1], so it now contains a note that edit=2Ephp=2Enet is= currently not in a usable state=2E > >Besides that, I didn't find any big points that could have been added to = the RFC=2E > >So, unless a big new discussion starts, I will open votes this Saturday= =2E=C2=A0 > >But I have two questions: > >1=2E What kind of majority in votes will this RFC need to get accepted?= =C2=A0 Everything is =E2=85=94 now=2E=20 >2=2E Am I allowed to vote on my own RFC? If you have voting rights, sure=2E However, I'm thinking that you're massively underestimating the work that = is involved to implement this, and some of it might not be possible (for ex= ample coralling dokuwiki to use this style of logging in)=2E Personally, I'm questioning whether it's really worth the effort=2E I don'= t think I'll be voting in favour, as I'm going to guess that I'll end up ha= ving to support a lot of this=2E=20 cheers=20 Derick =C2=A0