Hey PHP Devs!
Since the RFC to str_contains is now almost a week old and most of the
discussion happened in the initial discussion/proposal thread, I wasn't
sure if everyone has seen it. Therefore I'd like to create this new email
thread with the correct label for RFC discussions, before we open up the
RFC for voting in approximately a week from now.
If there is any feedback or something you'd like to discuss, feel free to
leave it here.
Link to RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/str_contains
Regards
Philipp
Hey PHP Devs!
Since the RFC to str_contains is now almost a week old and most of the
discussion happened in the initial discussion/proposal thread, I wasn't
sure if everyone has seen it. Therefore I'd like to create this new email
thread with the correct label for RFC discussions, before we open up the
RFC for voting in approximately a week from now.If there is any feedback or something you'd like to discuss, feel free to
leave it here.Link to RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/str_contains
Regards
Philipp
Just so I’m clear on the functionality here, is this essentially the same behavior as the following?
strpos($haystack, $needle) !== false
And the purpose is primarily for a better developer experience by reducing confusion through providing a dedicated function for this behavior?
Cheers,
Ben
Ben Ramsey ben@benramsey.com schrieb am Mo. 24. Feb. 2020 um 17:21:
On Feb 23, 2020, at 03:12, Philipp Tanlak philipp.tanlak@gmail.com
wrote:Hey PHP Devs!
Since the RFC to str_contains is now almost a week old and most of the
discussion happened in the initial discussion/proposal thread, I wasn't
sure if everyone has seen it. Therefore I'd like to create this new email
thread with the correct label for RFC discussions, before we open up the
RFC for voting in approximately a week from now.If there is any feedback or something you'd like to discuss, feel free to
leave it here.Link to RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/str_contains
Regards
PhilippJust so I’m clear on the functionality here, is this essentially the same
behavior as the following?strpos($haystack, $needle) !== falseAnd the purpose is primarily for a better developer experience by reducing
confusion through providing a dedicated function for this behavior?Cheers,
Ben
Yes, this is correct.
Regards
Philipp
Ben Ramsey ben@benramsey.com schrieb am Mo. 24. Feb. 2020 um 17:21:
Hey PHP Devs!
Since the RFC to str_contains is now almost a week old and most of the
discussion happened in the initial discussion/proposal thread, I wasn't
sure if everyone has seen it. Therefore I'd like to create this new email
thread with the correct label for RFC discussions, before we open up the
RFC for voting in approximately a week from now.If there is any feedback or something you'd like to discuss, feel free to
leave it here.Link to RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/str_contains
Regards
PhilippJust so I’m clear on the functionality here, is this essentially the same behavior as the following?
strpos($haystack, $needle) !== falseAnd the purpose is primarily for a better developer experience by reducing confusion through providing a dedicated function for this behavior?
Yes, this is correct.
As an effort to improve developer experience, I’m on board with this. I think it make sense to add this.
Cheers,
Ben
Ben Ramsey ben@benramsey.com schrieb am Mo. 24. Feb. 2020 um 17:21:
Hey PHP Devs!
Since the RFC to str_contains is now almost a week old and most of the
discussion happened in the initial discussion/proposal thread, I wasn't
sure if everyone has seen it. Therefore I'd like to create this new email
thread with the correct label for RFC discussions, before we open up the
RFC for voting in approximately a week from now.If there is any feedback or something you'd like to discuss, feel free to
leave it here.Link to RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/str_contains
Regards
PhilippJust so I’m clear on the functionality here, is this essentially the same behavior as the following?
strpos($haystack, $needle) !== falseAnd the purpose is primarily for a better developer experience by reducing confusion through providing a dedicated function for this behavior?
Yes, this is correct.
As an effort to improve developer experience, I’m on board with this. I
think it make sense to add this.Cheers,
Ben
I fully support this as well. It's a common source of subtle bugs, and a minor change to the standard library can eliminate a major PHP WTF.
--Larry Garfield