Voting & Workflow RFC - update View as Markdown

All,

I've read the detailed and very informative feedback from both Pierre and
Dan, as well as feedback from others (Nikita & more) over the last few
days, and I'm now convinced that breaking the Voting part away from the
Workflow part is the right way forward. Not because ideally they shouldn't
be bundled together - but because it's simply too big to digest at the same
time.

So I'm going to work on doing that, focusing first at the Voting side of
things, while also factoring in feedback both in terms of added information
as well as some changes to the proposal. I've been a bit insomniac, but I
hope to have it ready in the next few days.

Zeev

Hi Zeev,

All,

I've read the detailed and very informative feedback from both Pierre and
Dan, as well as feedback from others (Nikita & more) over the last few
days, and I'm now convinced that breaking the Voting part away from the
Workflow part is the right way forward. Not because ideally they shouldn't
be bundled together - but because it's simply too big to digest at the same
time.

So I'm going to work on doing that, focusing first at the Voting side of
things, while also factoring in feedback both in terms of added information
as well as some changes to the proposal. I've been a bit insomniac, but I
hope to have it ready in the next few days.

This is excellent news. Thanks you for trying to tackle these heavy topics.

best,
Pierre

Hi Zeev,

All,

I've read the detailed and very informative feedback from both Pierre and
Dan, as well as feedback from others (Nikita & more) over the last few
days, and I'm now convinced that breaking the Voting part away from the
Workflow part is the right way forward. Not because ideally they
shouldn't
be bundled together - but because it's simply too big to digest at the
same
time.

So I'm going to work on doing that, focusing first at the Voting side of
things, while also factoring in feedback both in terms of added
information
as well as some changes to the proposal. I've been a bit insomniac, but I
hope to have it ready in the next few days.

This is excellent news. Thanks you for trying to tackle these heavy topics.

You're welcome, although based on the events of recent days I'm not so sure
there's much appetite here for a more structured way of doing things.

Zeev

Hi Zeev,

All,

I've read the detailed and very informative feedback from both Pierre and
Dan, as well as feedback from others (Nikita & more) over the last few
days, and I'm now convinced that breaking the Voting part away from the
Workflow part is the right way forward. Not because ideally they
shouldn't
be bundled together - but because it's simply too big to digest at the
same
time.

So I'm going to work on doing that, focusing first at the Voting side of
things, while also factoring in feedback both in terms of added
information
as well as some changes to the proposal. I've been a bit insomniac, but
I
hope to have it ready in the next few days.

This is excellent news. Thanks you for trying to tackle these heavy
topics.

You're welcome, although based on the events of recent days I'm not so
sure there's much appetite here for a more structured way of doing things.

I think there is. As you mentioned there are quite a few parts to clarify.
The margin RFC is only one. Let me know if you need any help.

best
Pierre