Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104335
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJHtznyG+572XOqjV67hOOYN3BSF3XFkp8rphf6wv8UhoB0b8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU5K3ysTgr+rh7bh8Edo6GNiBL5xQZAUwR48-Usm9wouyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJHtznw_97duhK=gGXsAM3VE=2DuqyL0dn9opcUwWckmfUp3Ng@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJHtznw_97duhK=gGXsAM3VE=2DuqyL0dn9opcUwWckmfUp3Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 06:56:55 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6rtGQomSde4fZeVNv8KmZFE=+BeEjOV+9Qk28DJTS7Qg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000009ec31058192f338"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Voting & Workflow RFC - update
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--00000000000009ec31058192f338
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019, 9:34 PM Zeev Suraski <zeev@php.net wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:18 AM Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Zeev,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019, 4:55 PM Zeev Suraski <zeev@php.net wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I've read the detailed and very informative feedback from both Pierre and
>>> Dan, as well as feedback from others (Nikita & more) over the last few
>>> days, and I'm now convinced that breaking the Voting part away from the
>>> Workflow part is the right way forward.  Not because ideally they
>>> shouldn't
>>> be bundled together - but because it's simply too big to digest at the
>>> same
>>> time.
>>>
>>> So I'm going to work on doing that, focusing first at the Voting side of
>>> things, while also factoring in feedback both in terms of added
>>> information
>>> as well as some changes to the proposal.  I've been a bit insomniac, but
>>> I
>>> hope to have it ready in the next few days.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is excellent news. Thanks you for trying to tackle these heavy
>> topics.
>>
>
> You're welcome, although based on the events of recent days I'm not so
> sure there's much appetite here for a more structured way of doing things.
>


I think there is. As you mentioned there are quite a few parts to clarify.
The margin RFC is only one. Let me know if you need any help.

best
Pierre

--00000000000009ec31058192f338--