Greetings again PHPeople,
I wanted to avoid the discussion for the small improvements I was proposing
thinking it would be acceptable to do so (
http://news.php.net/php.internals/97118) but apparently I was wrong (sorry
for that), so here's the discussion thread!
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arrayiterator-improvements
Again this is my first RFC, and I hope I'm doing nothing wrong this time :P
Thanks again,
Wes
(and special thanks to Room11 for their feedback about the RFC process)
Greetings again PHPeople,
I wanted to avoid the discussion for the small improvements I was proposing
thinking it would be acceptable to do so (
http://news.php.net/php.internals/97118) but apparently I was wrong (sorry
for that), so here's the discussion thread!https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arrayiterator-improvements
Again this is my first RFC, and I hope I'm doing nothing wrong this time :P
Thanks again,
Wes(and special thanks to Room11 for their feedback about the RFC process)
What's the reason for making seekKey() return a boolean? The existing
seek() method throws an exception if the seek offset does not exist. It
would make sense to me for seekKey() to throw an exception if the key does
not exist, to keep things consistent.
Nikita
I have decided to go with that because
1- I'm a fan of using Exceptions (mostly) for exceptional error conditions;
between these two
public seekKey($key):void throws WhateverException;
public seekKey($key):bool;
I (by far) prefer the latter.
2- I think it would require a new type of SPL Exception, because none of
the existing makes sense to use here, in my opinion.
2016-11-22 21:43 GMT+01:00 Nikita Popov nikita.ppv@gmail.com:
Greetings again PHPeople,
I wanted to avoid the discussion for the small improvements I was
proposing
thinking it would be acceptable to do so (
http://news.php.net/php.internals/97118) but apparently I was wrong
(sorry
for that), so here's the discussion thread!https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arrayiterator-improvements
Again this is my first RFC, and I hope I'm doing nothing wrong this time
:PThanks again,
Wes(and special thanks to Room11 for their feedback about the RFC process)
What's the reason for making seekKey() return a boolean? The existing
seek() method throws an exception if the seek offset does not exist. It
would make sense to me for seekKey() to throw an exception if the key does
not exist, to keep things consistent.Nikita
Hi,
Given that this new method seems closely related to ArrayIterator::seek, I (as a userland developer) would very much expect it to handle error conditions in the same way.
In the case of ArrayIterator::seek - it throws an OutOfBoundsException. I don’t see how that isn’t appropriate for seekKey?
Cheers
Stephen
I have decided to go with that because
1- I'm a fan of using Exceptions (mostly) for exceptional error conditions;
between these two
public seekKey($key):void throws WhateverException;
public seekKey($key):bool;
I (by far) prefer the latter.2- I think it would require a new type of SPL Exception, because none of
the existing makes sense to use here, in my opinion.2016-11-22 21:43 GMT+01:00 Nikita Popov nikita.ppv@gmail.com:
Greetings again PHPeople,
I wanted to avoid the discussion for the small improvements I was
proposing
thinking it would be acceptable to do so (
http://news.php.net/php.internals/97118) but apparently I was wrong
(sorry
for that), so here's the discussion thread!https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arrayiterator-improvements
Again this is my first RFC, and I hope I'm doing nothing wrong this time
:PThanks again,
Wes(and special thanks to Room11 for their feedback about the RFC process)
What's the reason for making seekKey() return a boolean? The existing
seek() method throws an exception if the seek offset does not exist. It
would make sense to me for seekKey() to throw an exception if the key does
not exist, to keep things consistent.Nikita