Hi,
Time goes by fast - no sooner 7.0 was unleashed on the world than 7.1 bangs
at the door. I would like to bring a couple of points regarding this.
There is enough time yet, but it would make full sense all the RFC authors
targeting 7.1 to finalize the work and get the RFC voted. Or the RFCs, that
have not been discussed yet - still some time is there to go through the
full RFC process and get them ready for 7.1. It is anyway the right moment
to intensify the discussions and work on 7.1 features and patches.
It looks also like the right time to elect the 7.1 RMs. Please everyone
interested to run for 7.1 RMs announce your candidacy to this thread. I
would suggest to start the poll on this two weeks after this message, with
the two weeks vote period.
The prerelease cycle start could then happen already in June (or July,
depends whether one wants to wait till 5.5 EOL). Anyway, having the new RMs
team we can start to plan and proceed with the 7.1 prerelease cycle.
Thanks
Anatol
Hi,
Time goes by fast - no sooner 7.0 was unleashed on the world than 7.1 bangs
at the door. I would like to bring a couple of points regarding this.There is enough time yet, but it would make full sense all the RFC authors
targeting 7.1 to finalize the work and get the RFC voted. Or the RFCs, that
have not been discussed yet - still some time is there to go through the
full RFC process and get them ready for 7.1. It is anyway the right moment
to intensify the discussions and work on 7.1 features and patches.It looks also like the right time to elect the 7.1 RMs. Please everyone
interested to run for 7.1 RMs announce your candidacy to this thread. I
would suggest to start the poll on this two weeks after this message, with
the two weeks vote period.The prerelease cycle start could then happen already in June (or July,
depends whether one wants to wait till 5.5 EOL). Anyway, having the new RMs
team we can start to plan and proceed with the 7.1 prerelease cycle.Thanks
Anatol
--
Yikes, time really flies.
The new ext/sodium is out, so I suppose it's high time to get that RFC
ready to be voted on.
Scott Arciszewski
Chief Development Officer
Paragon Initiative Enterprises https://paragonie.com/
Hi,
Time goes by fast - no sooner 7.0 was unleashed on the world than 7.1
bangs
at the door. I would like to bring a couple of points regarding this.There is enough time yet, but it would make full sense all the RFC authors
targeting 7.1 to finalize the work and get the RFC voted. Or the RFCs,
that
have not been discussed yet - still some time is there to go through the
full RFC process and get them ready for 7.1. It is anyway the right moment
to intensify the discussions and work on 7.1 features and patches.It looks also like the right time to elect the 7.1 RMs. Please everyone
interested to run for 7.1 RMs announce your candidacy to this thread. I
would suggest to start the poll on this two weeks after this message, with
the two weeks vote period.The prerelease cycle start could then happen already in June (or July,
depends whether one wants to wait till 5.5 EOL). Anyway, having the new
RMs
team we can start to plan and proceed with the 7.1 prerelease cycle.Thanks
Anatol
--
Yikes, time really flies.
The new ext/sodium is out, so I suppose it's high time to get that RFC ready
to be voted on.
Time runs :-)
Anyone for RMing 7.1 ?
We obviously need someone to volunteer :-p
Julien.Pauli
I'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also?
- Davey
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Scott Arciszewski scott@paragonie.com
wrote:Hi,
Time goes by fast - no sooner 7.0 was unleashed on the world than 7.1
bangs
at the door. I would like to bring a couple of points regarding this.There is enough time yet, but it would make full sense all the RFC
authors
targeting 7.1 to finalize the work and get the RFC voted. Or the RFCs,
that
have not been discussed yet - still some time is there to go through the
full RFC process and get them ready for 7.1. It is anyway the right
moment
to intensify the discussions and work on 7.1 features and patches.It looks also like the right time to elect the 7.1 RMs. Please everyone
interested to run for 7.1 RMs announce your candidacy to this thread. I
would suggest to start the poll on this two weeks after this message,
with
the two weeks vote period.The prerelease cycle start could then happen already in June (or July,
depends whether one wants to wait till 5.5 EOL). Anyway, having the new
RMs
team we can start to plan and proceed with the 7.1 prerelease cycle.Thanks
Anatol
--
Yikes, time really flies.
The new ext/sodium is out, so I suppose it's high time to get that RFC
ready
to be voted on.Time runs :-)
Anyone for RMing 7.1 ?
We obviously need someone to volunteer :-pJulien.Pauli
I'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also?
Hi.
The Co-RM is the version-1 RM, so it will be Anatol, RM of 7.0.
We are looking for a "master" RM here :-)
Julien.Pauli
co-RM can simply mean "one of the two RMs", and emphasize that somebody
would volunteer to take the role but not being comfortable to doing it
alone so I think we are on the same page.
I'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also?
Hi.
The Co-RM is the version-1 RM, so it will be Anatol, RM of 7.0.
We are looking for a "master" RM here :-)Julien.Pauli
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
co-RM can simply mean "one of the two RMs", and emphasize that somebody
would volunteer to take the role but not being comfortable to doing it
alone so I think we are on the same page.
Exactly. And I am convinced Davey and Anatol will come along together for
this release very well.
I'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also?
Hi.
The Co-RM is the version-1 RM, so it will be Anatol, RM of 7.0.
We are looking for a "master" RM here :-)Julien.Pauli
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
Hi Davey,
-----Original Message-----
From: me@daveyshafik.com [mailto:me@daveyshafik.com] On Behalf Of Davey
Shafik
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 5:03 AM
To: Julien Pauli jpauli@php.net
Cc: Scott Arciszewski scott@paragonie.com; Anatol Belski ab@php.net;
PHP internals internals@lists.php.net; Ferenc Kovacs tyra3l@gmail.com;
Stanislav Malyshev stas@php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmapI'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also?
- Davey
Thanks for the response. So, how would you see being the master RM for 7.1? I'd introduce you to the basics and would support in the pre-phase, so then you'd be fit to do things independently later on. If later there's yet one more volunteer, they can join you right at the moment. Otherwise you could count on me with some on demand help, ofc.
Thanks.
Anatol
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net
mailto:jpauli@php.net > wrote:On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Scott Arciszewski
<scott@paragonie.com mailto:scott@paragonie.com > wrote:On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Anatol Belski <ab@php.net
mailto:ab@php.net > wrote:Hi,
Time goes by fast - no sooner 7.0 was unleashed on the world than
7.1
bangs
at the door. I would like to bring a couple of points regarding this.There is enough time yet, but it would make full sense all the RFC
authors
targeting 7.1 to finalize the work and get the RFC voted. Or the RFCs,
that
have not been discussed yet - still some time is there to go through
the
full RFC process and get them ready for 7.1. It is anyway the right
moment
to intensify the discussions and work on 7.1 features and patches.It looks also like the right time to elect the 7.1 RMs. Please everyone
interested to run for 7.1 RMs announce your candidacy to this
thread. I
would suggest to start the poll on this two weeks after this message,
with
the two weeks vote period.The prerelease cycle start could then happen already in June (or July,
depends whether one wants to wait till 5.5 EOL). Anyway, having the
new
RMs
team we can start to plan and proceed with the 7.1 prerelease cycle.Thanks
Anatol
--
Yikes, time really flies.
The new ext/sodium is out, so I suppose it's high time to get that RFC
ready
to be voted on.Time runs :-)
Anyone for RMing 7.1 ?
We obviously need someone to volunteer :-pJulien.Pauli
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Anatol Belski anatol.php@belski.net
wrote:
Hi Davey,
-----Original Message-----
From: me@daveyshafik.com [mailto:me@daveyshafik.com] On Behalf Of Davey
Shafik
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 5:03 AM
To: Julien Pauli jpauli@php.net
Cc: Scott Arciszewski scott@paragonie.com; Anatol Belski ab@php.net;
PHP internals internals@lists.php.net; Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com
;
Stanislav Malyshev stas@php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmapI'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also?
- Davey
Thanks for the response. So, how would you see being the master RM for
7.1? I'd introduce you to the basics and would support in the pre-phase, so
then you'd be fit to do things independently later on. If later there's yet
one more volunteer, they can join you right at the moment. Otherwise you
could count on me with some on demand help, ofc.Thanks.
Anatol
Anatol,
I'm honestly not 100% sure what all is involved, is this documented
somewhere?
I'm a bit worried that my lack of C mastery will be an issue, but if that's
not a problem, then I'd be glad to move forward as you say above.
- Davey
Morning internals,
If Davey wants another person, that could be me.
Cheers
Joe
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Anatol Belski anatol.php@belski.net
wrote:Hi Davey,
-----Original Message-----
From: me@daveyshafik.com [mailto:me@daveyshafik.com] On Behalf Of
Davey
Shafik
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 5:03 AM
To: Julien Pauli jpauli@php.net
Cc: Scott Arciszewski scott@paragonie.com; Anatol Belski <ab@php.net
;
PHP internals internals@lists.php.net; Ferenc Kovacs <
tyra3l@gmail.com
;
Stanislav Malyshev stas@php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmapI'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also?
- Davey
Thanks for the response. So, how would you see being the master RM for
7.1? I'd introduce you to the basics and would support in the pre-phase,
so
then you'd be fit to do things independently later on. If later there's
yet
one more volunteer, they can join you right at the moment. Otherwise you
could count on me with some on demand help, ofc.Thanks.
Anatol
Anatol,
I'm honestly not 100% sure what all is involved, is this documented
somewhere?I'm a bit worried that my lack of C mastery will be an issue, but if that's
not a problem, then I'd be glad to move forward as you say above.
- Davey
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Anatol Belski anatol.php@belski.net
wrote:Hi Davey,
-----Original Message-----
From: me@daveyshafik.com [mailto:me@daveyshafik.com] On Behalf Of Davey
Shafik
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 5:03 AM
To: Julien Pauli jpauli@php.net
Cc: Scott Arciszewski scott@paragonie.com; Anatol Belski ab@php.net;
PHP internals internals@lists.php.net; Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com
;
Stanislav Malyshev stas@php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmapI'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also?
- Davey
Thanks for the response. So, how would you see being the master RM for
7.1? I'd introduce you to the basics and would support in the pre-phase, so
then you'd be fit to do things independently later on. If later there's yet
one more volunteer, they can join you right at the moment. Otherwise you
could count on me with some on demand help, ofc.Thanks.
Anatol
Anatol,
I'm honestly not 100% sure what all is involved, is this documented
somewhere?I'm a bit worried that my lack of C mastery will be an issue, but if that's
not a problem, then I'd be glad to move forward as you say above.
C knowledge is not required but a good thing.
Also C knowledge is required to know the impact of a patch internally.
Enough people are around to actually review patches and raises
possible issues. I would not worry too much about that. Lukas for
example did a great job and was not a C developer to begin with.
The key role however of the RM is to ensure that the release process
goes smoothly, the planing is respected and BC is kept during the full
life of a given release.
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
Hi,
-----Original Message-----
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 11:46 AM
To: Davey Shafik davey@php.net
Cc: Anatol Belski anatol.php@belski.net; Julien Pauli jpauli@php.net; Scott
Arciszewski scott@paragonie.com; Anatol Belski ab@php.net; PHP
internals internals@lists.php.net; Ferenc Kovacs tyra3l@gmail.com;
Stanislav Malyshev stas@php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmapI'm honestly not 100% sure what all is involved, is this documented
somewhere?I'm a bit worried that my lack of C mastery will be an issue, but if
that's not a problem, then I'd be glad to move forward as you say above.C knowledge is not required but a good thing.
Also C knowledge is required to know the impact of a patch internally.
Enough people are around to actually review patches and raises possible issues.
I would not worry too much about that. Lukas for example did a great job and
was not a C developer to begin with.The key role however of the RM is to ensure that the release process goes
smoothly, the planing is respected and BC is kept during the full life of a given
release.
Yeah, good description.
Davey, Joe, looks like we have a team now! I've already created the https://wiki.php.net/todo/php71 . Added myself as well, similarly to todo70, so we have more chance to have one team to be selected. I'd be waiting yet till Tuesday and send the voting invitation. After the one week vote (as per RFC), we'll be super good in time for planning and preparations.
Thanks
Anatol
Hi Anatol,
Sounds good to me.
Cheers
Joe
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Anatol Belski anatol.php@belski.net
wrote:
Hi,
-----Original Message-----
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 11:46 AM
To: Davey Shafik davey@php.net
Cc: Anatol Belski anatol.php@belski.net; Julien Pauli jpauli@php.net;
Scott
Arciszewski scott@paragonie.com; Anatol Belski ab@php.net; PHP
internals internals@lists.php.net; Ferenc Kovacs tyra3l@gmail.com;
Stanislav Malyshev stas@php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmapI'm honestly not 100% sure what all is involved, is this documented
somewhere?I'm a bit worried that my lack of C mastery will be an issue, but if
that's not a problem, then I'd be glad to move forward as you say
above.C knowledge is not required but a good thing.
Also C knowledge is required to know the impact of a patch internally.
Enough people are around to actually review patches and raises possible
issues.
I would not worry too much about that. Lukas for example did a great job
and
was not a C developer to begin with.The key role however of the RM is to ensure that the release process goes
smoothly, the planing is respected and BC is kept during the full life
of a given
release.Yeah, good description.
Davey, Joe, looks like we have a team now! I've already created the
https://wiki.php.net/todo/php71 . Added myself as well, similarly to
todo70, so we have more chance to have one team to be selected. I'd be
waiting yet till Tuesday and send the voting invitation. After the one week
vote (as per RFC), we'll be super good in time for planning and
preparations.Thanks
Anatol
Hi Anatol,
Sounds good to me.
Cheers
Joe
Nice, we are moving forward !
Anyway, Anatol and I are here to help with the tasks.
The job is mainly about reviewing code, and above all : organize
people and human beeings.
This is really a human-targeted job, more than a code-oriented job.
But the job requires involvement every month at least, and that, for
at least a 3-year period.
Feel free to ping on IRC or mailing lists if help needed, or questions.
We are a team alltogether ;-)
Julien.Pauli