Hey all,
following on from previous discussions[1], I am introducing an RFC for
adding HTTP/2 support to the built-in CLI server:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/cli_server_http2
Given that the RFC contains two potential solutions for implementing this,
I've decided it is best to open up discussion on this now.
While I've authored this RFC, I do not think I am capable of implementing
this, but I am going to try. I'm currently trying to get to grips with the
existing cli-server, and seeing if I can add H/2 support to the existing
SAPI. However, it might be easier to just write a new SAPI from scratch —
is there a good SAPI I can use as an example to learn that side of things?
Would anyone be interested in taking this on for 7.1? or pairing/mentoring
on it?
- Davey
[1] internals@lists.php.net/msg82237.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg82237.html
Hey all,
following on from previous discussions[1], I am introducing an RFC for
adding HTTP/2 support to the built-in CLI server:
I think this is good to have, but I have a few comments:
php -S 0.0.0.0:8080 –http2 -t ./public/ ./public/index.html
The -http2, should really be two --'s. Only short (one letter options)
get a single '-'.
Similarly: –[no-]http2, should probably be either '--with-http2' and/or
'--without-http2', as it depends on an external library.
Given that the RFC contains two potential solutions for implementing
this, I've decided it is best to open up discussion on this now.While I've authored this RFC, I do not think I am capable of
implementing this, but I am going to try. I'm currently trying to get
to grips with the existing cli-server, and seeing if I can add H/2
support to the existing SAPI. However, it might be easier to just
write a new SAPI from scratch — is there a good SAPI I can use as an
example to learn that side of things?Would anyone be interested in taking this on for 7.1? or
pairing/mentoring on it?
I don't think I have the time for that, but feel free to pop into IRC
for questions.
cheers,
Derick
Hey all,
following on from previous discussions[1], I am introducing an RFC for
adding HTTP/2 support to the built-in CLI server:I think this is good to have, but I have a few comments:
php -S 0.0.0.0:8080 –http2 -t ./public/ ./public/index.html
The -http2, should really be two --'s. Only short (one letter options)
get a single '-'.Similarly: –[no-]http2, should probably be either '--with-http2' and/or
'--without-http2', as it depends on an external library.
I think my autocomplete replaced the two dashes with an emdash, oops. Yes, two dashes for both.
The --no-http flag is for turning off HTTP/2 when running the cli-server, if it is enabled by default (as I think it should be), allowing you to test things like fallback to HTTP/1.x for HTTP/2 clients. This is not a compile flag, that would definitely be --with or --without.
Given that the RFC contains two potential solutions for implementing
this, I've decided it is best to open up discussion on this now.While I've authored this RFC, I do not think I am capable of
implementing this, but I am going to try. I'm currently trying to get
to grips with the existing cli-server, and seeing if I can add H/2
support to the existing SAPI. However, it might be easier to just
write a new SAPI from scratch — is there a good SAPI I can use as an
example to learn that side of things?Would anyone be interested in taking this on for 7.1? or
pairing/mentoring on it?I don't think I have the time for that, but feel free to pop into IRC
for questions.
Thanks!
- Davey
Hey all,
following on from previous discussions[1], I am introducing an RFC for
adding HTTP/2 support to the built-in CLI server:I think this is good to have, but I have a few comments:
php -S 0.0.0.0:8080 –http2 -t ./public/ ./public/index.html
The -http2, should really be two --'s. Only short (one letter options)
get a single '-'.Similarly: –[no-]http2, should probably be either '--with-http2' and/or
'--without-http2', as it depends on an external library.
I think my autocomplete replaced the two dashes with an emdash, oops. Yes, two dashes for both.
The --no-http flag is for turning off HTTP/2 when running the cli-server, if it is enabled by default (as I think it should be), allowing you to test things like fallback to HTTP/1.x for HTTP/2 clients. This is not a compile flag, that would definitely be --with or --without.
Given that the RFC contains two potential solutions for implementing
this, I've decided it is best to open up discussion on this now.While I've authored this RFC, I do not think I am capable of
implementing this, but I am going to try. I'm currently trying to get
to grips with the existing cli-server, and seeing if I can add H/2
support to the existing SAPI. However, it might be easier to just
write a new SAPI from scratch — is there a good SAPI I can use as an
example to learn that side of things?Would anyone be interested in taking this on for 7.1? or
pairing/mentoring on it?I don't think I have the time for that, but feel free to pop into IRC
for questions.
Thanks!
- Davey
- Davey
Hey all,
following on from previous discussions[1], I am introducing an RFC for
adding HTTP/2 support to the built-in CLI server:I think this is good to have, but I have a few comments:
php -S 0.0.0.0:8080 –http2 -t ./public/ ./public/index.html
The -http2, should really be two --'s. Only short (one letter options)
get a single '-'.Similarly: –[no-]http2, should probably be either '--with-http2' and/or
'--without-http2', as it depends on an external library.Given that the RFC contains two potential solutions for implementing
this, I've decided it is best to open up discussion on this now.While I've authored this RFC, I do not think I am capable of
implementing this, but I am going to try. I'm currently trying to get
to grips with the existing cli-server, and seeing if I can add H/2
support to the existing SAPI. However, it might be easier to just
write a new SAPI from scratch — is there a good SAPI I can use as an
example to learn that side of things?Would anyone be interested in taking this on for 7.1? or
pairing/mentoring on it?I don't think I have the time for that, but feel free to pop into IRC
for questions.cheers,
Derick