http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/releases/pthreads/3.0.0/logs/

Well ... that didn't work, and doesn't tell me why ... anyone know what's
up ??

Cheers
Joe

Ah, I didn't think of using PHP5 to run pecl package ... that works ...

Cheers ...

Afternoon internals,

Is there any concrete plan for deploying pecl extensions for PHP7 ?

Anatol (or anyone), is there any way to get windows ext's built

against

RC's while we're waiting for PECL/pickle/apples/whatever to be sorted ?

Cheers
Joe

Quite a few extensions are being developed via branches now. It sounds
like this will be ok if pickle is being used, but should I be worried
about causing people headaches before that is ready?

I really don't want to have a bunch of preprocessor use in the
extensions I am working on. It makes them harder to maintain, and a lot
harder for new contributors.

thanks

Afternoon internals,

Is there any concrete plan for deploying pecl extensions for PHP7

?

Anatol (or anyone), is there any way to get windows ext's built

against

RC's while we're waiting for PECL/pickle/apples/whatever to be sorted
?

Cheers
Joe

Quite a few extensions are being developed via branches now. It sounds
like this will be ok if pickle is being used, but should I be worried
about causing people headaches before that is ready?

Fixing autocorrect :)

Branches are releases nightmares if they are all have the same versions,
like all are 1.4.x but only one branch supports 7.

I mean if an extension uses either 1.4 for 5.x and 1.5/2.x for 7 with same
APIs. This is a long term pain from a developer and end user point of view.

I have asked that some time ago already and pointed out that we should
really support semver and one branch per extension version, not per
supported php version.

I really don't want to have a bunch of preprocessor use in the
extensions I am working on. It makes them harder to maintain, and a lot
harder for new contributors.

It is not necessary required, you an email multiple files.

You can use multiple files.

Single branche also helps to ensure APIs compatibility across php versions
(same codename being maintained).

thanks

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le 10/09/2015 19:14, Pierre Joye a écrit :

Afternoon internals,

Is there any concrete plan for deploying pecl extensions for
PHP7 ?

Anatol (or anyone), is there any way to get windows ext's
built
against
RC's while we're waiting for PECL/pickle/apples/whatever to be
sorted ?

Cheers Joe

Quite a few extensions are being developed via branches now. It
sounds like this will be ok if pickle is being used, but should I
be worried about causing people headaches before that is ready?

Branches are releases nightmares if they are all have the same
versions, like all are 1.4.x but only one branch supports 7.

I have asked that some time ago already and pointed out that we
should really support semver and one branch per extension version,
not per supported php version.

I definitively agree on this.

" Extension version have to reflect the extension API version "

Which probably have to be the same for php 5 and php 7

Else imagine the nightmare for user to detect API...

I really don't want to have a bunch of preprocessor use in the
extensions I am working on. It makes them harder to maintain, and
a lot harder for new contributors.

It is not necessary required, you an email multiple files. Single
branche also helps to ensure APIs compatibility across php versions
(same codename being maintained).

Yes multiple files is NOT perfect, but it works
(when too much conditional for a single file)

See https://github.com/pierrejoye/php_zip
And it works.

Remi.

thanks

-- To
unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlXxv08ACgkQYUppBSnxahhOOACfTOWy9MnNlTCezhO3BeIDvRyU
OlsAn3zM1h7gGxm/OJ4R8EhvwV5cvkHN
=rFRS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Watkins [mailto:pthreads@pthreads.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 6:25 PM
To: Anatol Belski anatol.php@belski.net
Cc: PHP internals internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP7 PECL Extensions

Hi Anatol,

I thought vc14 deps were just copied from somewhere else, that's what I did

to test ?

Does that mean no dlls for now ?

Yep, those are copied from the prepared deps, but those deps are not built yet.The core deps are in place of course, but they're also built by humans :)

Any time is good, you have more important things to do ;)

Heh, a bit overdue now, but pthreads is now the first ringing bell witnessing the pecl deps should be done very soon. I'll see to build the pthreads ones this WE so you at least can avoid longer detention.

Regards

Anatol

Joe Watkins in php.internals (Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:25:22 +0100):

I thought vc14 deps were just copied from somewhere else, that's what I
did to test ?

Does that mean no dlls for now ?

Any time is good, you have more important things to do ;)

If you want to try right now, test it with my deps:
http://phpdev.toolsforresearch.com/SDK14.tar.7z

Double 7z x [filename] to extract them with 7-Zip 9.38+. There might be
symlinks (directory junctions) in the tar and 7-zip supports them in the
newest version.

Jan