Hi all,
Now that we’re slowly settling into the new big changes that were recently pushed into master, perhaps it’s a good time to review the Fast_ZPP proposal and put it to a vote.
It’s already present in functions that are deemed to benefit most from this optimisation, which is what it was meant for anyway.
The RFC mentions this as well (in friendly bolded text), but it’s worth mentioning again that this is NOT a replacement for ZPP; if you don’t want to use this new API, you can always use Johannes’ plugin for clang to still get warnings about type mismatches.
Best,
Tjerk (@datibbaw)
Hi Tjerk,
Agree.
Bob, is working on adopting his version of the patch.
Once he finish, we will update RFC and open voting.
If you have any related proposals, we may discuss them.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meesters@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Now that we’re slowly settling into the new big changes that were recently
pushed into master, perhaps it’s a good time to review the Fast_ZPP
proposal and put it to a vote.It’s already present in functions that are deemed to benefit most from
this optimisation, which is what it was meant for anyway.The RFC mentions this as well (in friendly bolded text), but it’s worth
mentioning again that this is NOT a replacement for ZPP; if you don’t want
to use this new API, you can always use Johannes’ plugin for clang to still
get warnings about type mismatches.Best,
Tjerk (@datibbaw)