(Sorry for the subject, I couldn't resist).
It seems that the parent class's variables are not being copied per bit
by the default implementation, so how should a superclasses __clone()
method be dealt with? In other words, should it be like this:
public function __clone()
{
$this = parent::__clone();
$this->... = $that->...
}
P.S.
Perhaps the $this object should already be set using the default
implementation, and then the user could override certain properties if
he so wishes; I believe the preliminary documentation says that this is
the case, but it doesn't work like this.
In other words, should it be like this:
Yes.
P.S.
Perhaps the $this object should already be set using the default
implementation, and then the user could override certain properties if
he so wishes; I believe the preliminary documentation says that this
is the case, but it doesn't work like this.
If you want the default cloning mechanism, you should just use the
default clone method. If you specify your own __clone method, then
you've effectively said 'I know what I am doing and how I want to do
it.' Magical setting of attributes would
a) be confusing
b) cause twice the work to be done for any variables you don't want to
be as default
George