Hello internals,
i would like to see ext/SPL from PECL as a default built-in PHP5 module.
It is stable enough and for 5.0 i do not plan any more features. Since some
earlier SimpleXML features are moved into SPL this makes even more sense.
Any votes pro or against?
Best regards,
Marcus mailto:mail@marcus-boerger.de
i would like to see ext/SPL from PECL as a default built-in PHP5 module.
It is stable enough and for 5.0 i do not plan any more features. Since some
earlier SimpleXML features are moved into SPL this makes even more sense.
Any votes pro or against?
+1
Derick
On Sunday, Jan 18, 2004, at 23:22 Europe/Copenhagen, Marcus Boerger
wrote:
Hello internals,
i would like to see ext/SPL from PECL as a default built-in PHP5
module.
It is stable enough and for 5.0 i do not plan any more features. Since
some
earlier SimpleXML features are moved into SPL this makes even more
sense.
Any votes pro or against?
+1 from here too since it allows extension authors to add advanced
features.
Edin
i would like to see ext/SPL from PECL as a default built-in PHP5 module.
It is stable enough and for 5.0 i do not plan any more features. Since some
earlier SimpleXML features are moved into SPL this makes even more sense.
Any votes pro or against?
+1
I hope to use SPL some time soon in the context of my new PHP5-aware
Python extension.
--
Jon Parise (jon@php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/)
i would like to see ext/SPL from PECL as a default built-in PHP5
module.
It is stable enough and for 5.0 i do not plan any more features.
Since some
earlier SimpleXML features are moved into SPL this makes even more
sense.
Any votes pro or against?+1
+1, SPL is cool.
George
George Schlossnagle wrote:
i would like to see ext/SPL from PECL as a default built-in PHP5
module.
It is stable enough and for 5.0 i do not plan any more features.
Since some
earlier SimpleXML features are moved into SPL this makes even more
sense.
Any votes pro or against?+1
+1, SPL is cool.
George
+1, SPL looks promising.
+1, SPL is cool.
George
+1, SPL looks promising.
SPL, SPL. SPL? SPL! SPL, SPPPLLLL.
Bonus points if you recognize the movie reference.
-Andrei
"Dealing with failure is easy: Work hard to improve. Success is also
easy to handle: You've solved the wrong problem. Work hard to improve."
- Alan Perlis
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
SPL, SPL. SPL? SPL! SPL, SPPPLLLL.
Bonus points if you recognize the movie reference.
Being John Malkovich :-)
- Chris
Bonus points if you recognize the movie reference.
Being John Malkovich :-)
That-a-boy.
-Andrei
- I don't have a solution but I admire the problem. *
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Any votes pro or against?
+1, although something's currently b0rked on Windows:
simplexml.obj: error LNK2001:
Unresolved external symbol: _zm_startup_spl_sxe
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Das Buch zu PHP 5: http://professionelle-softwareentwicklung-mit-php5.de/
Fine with me.
At 11:22 PM 1/18/2004 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello internals,
i would like to see ext/SPL from PECL as a default built-in PHP5 module.
It is stable enough and for 5.0 i do not plan any more features. Since some
earlier SimpleXML features are moved into SPL this makes even more sense.
Any votes pro or against?Best regards,
Marcus mailto:mail@marcus-boerger.de