Hi guys,
While checking a RFC page I noticed the Status was showing "Under
discussion" while the RFC list (https://wiki.php.net/rfc) was showing it
was Implemented.
Then I checked several other RFC's and quite a lot of them have mismatching
information. I compiled a list so somebody with access could revisit and
fix them.
5.3
Accepted:
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceresolution
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceseparator
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/heredoc-with-double-quotes (says Accepted but
also Implemented) - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/lsb_parentself_forwarding
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/e-user-deprecated-warning
Under discussion:
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fpm
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fpm/ini_syntax
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/newinis
5.4
Accepted:
Voting:
"Committed":
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/horizontalreuse
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures/object-extension
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortags
Under discussion:
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/removal-of-deprecated-features
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/runtimecache
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/zendsignals
- https://wiki.php.net/rfc/callable
"Dead as no one seem to be interested in" (my favorite status):
"Old hat":
5.5
Accepted:
"Commited":
Under discussion:
Thanks!
--
Renan Gonçalves aka renan.saddam
Software Engineer at TrueServer B.V.
CakePHP Core Developer
W: renangoncalves.com
T: twitter.com/renan_saddam
M: +31 (0)6 4662 1860
L: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Renan Gonçalves renan.saddam@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys,
While checking a RFC page I noticed the Status was showing "Under
discussion" while the RFC list (https://wiki.php.net/rfc) was showing it
was Implemented.Then I checked several other RFC's and quite a lot of them have mismatching
information. I compiled a list so somebody with access could revisit and
fix them.
Thanks, I updated all statuses of the listed RFCs to "Implemented in PHP
5.x". Only one I didn't change is
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/allow_multiple_simultaneous_syslog_connections,
because I have no idea whether that actually landed or not.
Nikita
Thanks, I updated all statuses of the listed RFCs to "Implemented in PHP
5.x". Only one I didn't change is
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/allow_multiple_simultaneous_syslog_connections,
because I have no idea whether that actually landed or not.
Hello,
As a related note, the "How To Create an RFC" page
(https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto) states this:
- When your feature is implemented in PHP, update the RFC with:
i. the version(s) it was merged to
ii. a link to the git commit(s)
iii. a link to the PHP manual entry for the feature
Some of your own RFCs don't have this, nor do others. I think this
should also be addressed.
Thanks.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/
Thanks, I updated all statuses of the listed RFCs to "Implemented in PHP
5.x". Only one I didn't change is
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/allow_multiple_simultaneous_syslog_connections,
because I have no idea whether that actually landed or not.Hello,
As a related note, the "How To Create an RFC" page (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto) states this:
- When your feature is implemented in PHP, update the RFC with:
i. the version(s) it was merged to
ii. a link to the git commit(s)
iii. a link to the PHP manual entry for the featureSome of your own RFCs don't have this, nor do others. I think this should also be addressed.
Thanks.
The creation steps were not in their current form until after a number
of RFCs were created. Not all RFCs will contain the information that
they mention. I don't think there is a huge value in retro updating
old RFCs - but feel free to do it.
If the PHP Manual doesn't have useful information about the feature
(description and implementation version), then log a bug or fix the
manual directly.
Chris
--
christopher.jones@oracle.com http://twitter.com/ghrd
Free PHP & Oracle book:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/php/underground-php-oracle-manual-098250.html
The creation steps were not in their current form until after a number
of RFCs were created. Not all RFCs will contain the information that
they mention. I don't think there is a huge value in retro updating
old RFCs - but feel free to do it.
Ah, I see. I was unaware of that, and I agree.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/
The creation steps were not in their current form until after a number
of RFCs were created. Not all RFCs will contain the information that
they mention. I don't think there is a huge value in retro updating
old RFCs - but feel free to do it.Ah, I see. I was unaware of that, and I agree.
If you find any RFC created after June 2013 that is lacking, prod the authors.
Chris
--
christopher.jones@oracle.com http://twitter.com/ghrd
Free PHP & Oracle book:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/php/underground-php-oracle-manual-098250.html