From: Lukas Smith [mailto:smith@backendmedia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:46 PM
From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:46 PMFrom: Sascha Schumann [mailto:sascha@schumann.cx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:39 PMThe fact that PEAR has a serious problem extending non studlyCap
objects
is
probably something a lot of people in PHP core don't care about.Please elaborate.Well if I extend a class that doesnt use studlyCaps, yet the PEAR CS
requires that I use studlyCaps, then I have a problem. Essentially I
can
only wrap and not extend.Uh? That works just fine...
class Foo_Bar extends foo2_bar {
}No problem at all.
We are talking about methods names here.
Just to clarify:
Yes there are no technical issues.
There is only the fact that PEAR has decided to have a consistent OO API
based on studlyCaps.
Regards,
Lukas