Ternary operator performance improvements

Hi Miroslav & Arnaud,

Hi,

I've already posted this patch and it has since been reviewed and
improved.
I'm re-posting it for discussion before eventually commiting it.

The ternary operator always copies its second or third operand, which
is very
slow compared to an if/else when the operand is an array for example:
...

Same "copy always" behavior is made with string in ternary operator, and
it can be
also very annoying e.g:

$content =
file_get_contents('http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html-markup-20110525/spec.html');

$test = $content !== false ? $content : '';
Is it the same with: $content = file_get_contents('…') ?: ''; Maybe we
could have a heuristic for this shortcut operator no?

Best regards.

--
Ivan Enderlin
Developer of Hoa
http://hoa.42/ or http://hoa-project.net/

PhD. student at LIFC/DISC (Vesontio) and INRIA (Cassis)
http://lifc.univ-fcomte.fr/ and http://www.inria.fr/

Member of HTML and WebApps Working Group of W3C
http://w3.org/

Hi Miroslav!

Yes, the ternary patch fixes that problem too :)

Nikita

2011/11/9 Miroslav Kubelík koubel@php.net:

Hi,

I've already posted this patch and it has since been reviewed and
improved.
I'm re-posting it for discussion before eventually commiting it.

The ternary operator always copies its second or third operand, which is
very
slow compared to an if/else when the operand is an array for example: ...

Same "copy always" behavior is made with string in ternary operator, and
it can be
also very annoying e.g:

$content =
file_get_contents('http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html-markup-20110525/spec.html');
$test = $content !== false ? $content : '';

Is this case also solved with your patch or huge strings are still problem
with a ternary "copy always" functionality? Maybe it's more rare case then
array.

P.S: Sorry I don't test it directly with beta2, I have no place to test.

M. Kubelik