Closure/lambda semantic comparaison

Hello,

Hi,

I am proposing a comparison between PHP closure with lisp one.

First thing to compare is how scope are capture:
Suppose I want to create a function that add.
The common idiom to do it in lisp is:

(defun adder (x) #'(lambda (y) (+ x y)))

Then if I want the add3 method you can do:

(setf (symbol-function 'add3) (adder 3))
(add3 4) => 7

Now let reproduce that in php:

$adder = function ($x) {return function ($y) use($x)  {return $y + $x;};};
$add3 = $adder(3);
echo $add3(4); => 7

Every thing is fine but let change the adder into a counter :
In lisp you could do:

(let ((sum 0))
    (defun counter () (setf sum (1+ sum))))
(counter) => 1
(counter) => 2
(counter) => 3 ...

In other to have the same behavior in PHP you first need to transform the
let into a lambda which make no difference in lisp:

(funcall #'(lambda (sum) (defun counter () (setf sum (1+ sum)))) 0)

Now we are ready to do it in PHP.

$createCounter = function ($sum) { return function () use ($sum) {return
++$sum;};};
$counter = $createCounter(0);
$counter(); => 1
$counter(); => 1
$counter(); => 1
...

So that's not the expected behavior.
In oder to have the expected behavior you need to add & in front of $sum.
But & is kind of evil since it mimics dynamic scoping:

$array = array(1, 2, 3);
foreach($array as $pos)
{
  $adders[] = function ($x) use (&$pos) { return $pos+ $x;};
}

foreach($adders as $addIt)
{
 echo $addIt(5);
}

use($var) will import by copy, so you won't have the behavior you
expect. If you want to keep a value in a function between calls, you
can use "static $sum = 0;".

Thanks for your attention

-- Mathieu Suen

--

--
Etienne Kneuss
http://www.colder.ch

In my opinion this is consistent with the fact that PHP has no
block-scoped variables. The situation is similar with the one in JavaScript.

In JavaScript the problem has been solved by Mozilla with so-called let
definitions[1], which are block-scoped.

1:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/New_in_JavaScript_1.7#Block_scope_with_let

Hi,

I am proposing a comparison between PHP closure with lisp one.

First thing to compare is how scope are capture:
Suppose I want to create a function that add.
The common idiom to do it in lisp is:

(defun adder (x) #'(lambda (y) (+ x y)))

Then if I want the add3 method you can do:

(setf (symbol-function 'add3) (adder 3))
(add3 4) => 7

Now let reproduce that in php:

$adder = function ($x) {return function ($y) use($x) {return $y + $x;};};
$add3 = $adder(3);
echo $add3(4); => 7

Every thing is fine but let change the adder into a counter :
In lisp you could do:

(let ((sum 0))
(defun counter () (setf sum (1+ sum))))
(counter) => 1
(counter) => 2
(counter) => 3 ...

In other to have the same behavior in PHP you first need to transform
the let into a lambda which make no difference in lisp:

(funcall #'(lambda (sum) (defun counter () (setf sum (1+ sum)))) 0)

Now we are ready to do it in PHP.

$createCounter = function ($sum) { return function () use ($sum) {return
++$sum;};};
$counter = $createCounter(0);
$counter(); => 1
$counter(); => 1
$counter(); => 1
...

So that's not the expected behavior.
In oder to have the expected behavior you need to add & in front of $sum.
But & is kind of evil since it mimics dynamic scoping:

$array = array(1, 2, 3);
foreach($array as $pos)
{
$adders[] = function ($x) use (&$pos) { return $pos+ $x;};
}

foreach($adders as $addIt)
{
echo $addIt(5);
}

Thanks for your attention

-- Mathieu Suen

--
Ionut G. Stan
I'm under construction | http://blog.igstan.ro/