Unofficial php 4.3.3 Debian packages

Le Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 19:29:35 +1000, Kevin Waterson a écrit:

This one time, at band camp, Per Lundberg per@nobolt.com wrote:

Here is an idea: how about integrating the Debian packaging script with
the main PHP CVS code? This is done with some other Debian packages,
and it helps a lot for people who want to build a package from CVS...

How about including packaging for rpm and windows and any other
packaging system out there?

I think this would add too much.

I think so.

Including packaging scripts would :

• add buzz in the cvs tree (every distro/OS wanting his own piece of the
  cake)
• disturb the development of OFFICIAL debian packages

We should not bypass the work of the debian maintainers. They are free
to work the (debian-)way they want.

(I tried to make my packages compliant with their work and I would also
submit my changes if they ask me)

Regards.

--
Guillaume Plessis gui@php.net
GnuPG Key-ID: BA729AD0

Here is an idea: how about integrating the Debian packaging script with
the main PHP CVS code? This is done with some other Debian packages,
and it helps a lot for people who want to build a package from CVS...
How about including packaging for rpm and windows and any other
packaging system out there?

Sure. Why not? We are talking about text files here, not the actual
binary packages. It is a drop in the sea...

I am all for adding RPM .spec files as well as NSIS scripts (for Windows
installs) or whatever else. It will make PHP a better product.

Best regards,

Per Lundberg / Capio ApS
Phone: +46-18-4186040
Fax: +46-18-4186049
Web: http://www.nobolt.com

This one time, at band camp, Per Lundberg per@nobolt.com wrote:

Here is an idea: how about integrating the Debian packaging script with
the main PHP CVS code? This is done with some other Debian packages,
and it helps a lot for people who want to build a package from CVS...

How about including packaging for rpm and windows and any other
packaging system out there?

I think this would add too much.

I agree on this. We're not the distributors, so it's not our ballpark.

Derick

--
"Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those
that read the future by examining animal entrails."

Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
International PHP Magazine http://php-mag.net/

Kevin Waterson wrote:

How about including packaging for rpm and windows and any other
packaging system out there?

I think this would add too much.

AFAICS, the spec file for RPM is already on CVS:

http://cvs.php.net/annotate.php/php-src/php4.spec.in?login=2&rev=1.2

Or maybe I am mistaken, but it sure does look like a spec file ;) But
it's almost 2 years old (and not really complete I think)

Anyway, if having a spec file, we could also have a deb file (if someone
is interested in maintaining it of course).

Oliver

GB/E/IT d+ s+:+ a-- C++$ UL++++$ P++++ L+++$ E- W++$ N- ?o ?K w--(---)
!O M+$ V- PS+ PE- Y PGP t++ 5-- X+@ R- tv++ b++(+++) DI++++ D+ G++ e+>++
h(*) r y+(?)