Hi all
Attached* is a patch introducing a new parameter to in_array()
and
array_search()
which will set the internal pointer to the first
location of $needle in the $haystack (granted that $needle exists
within the $haystack).
This will make it possible to search for a value in an array and then
run prev()
/next() on the array to get the next/previous sibling.
I'd like to commit this after 5.2.4 has been released if there are no
objections?
-Hannes
- In case it doesn't come through: http://home.nith.no/~maghan/keeppos/
Hi all
Attached* is a patch introducing a new parameter to
in_array()
and
array_search()
which will set the internal pointer to the first
location of $needle in the $haystack (granted that $needle exists
within the $haystack).
Or should we maybe create two new functions?
bool array_seek_value(&$array, mixed $value [, bool $strict=false]);
bool array_seek_key(&$array, integer/string $key);
-Hannes
Smells like feature creep.
Plus, it's difficult to document. I think it would be the first
function that mutates an argument depending on another argument - it
would also mean that the input array is passed as a reference in case
that new flag is set.
Either way, not a good idea IMO. Especially in case of in_array()
.
David
Am 15.08.2007 um 16:59 schrieb Hannes Magnusson:
Hi all
Attached* is a patch introducing a new parameter to
in_array()
and
array_search()
which will set the internal pointer to the first
location of $needle in the $haystack (granted that $needle exists
within the $haystack).This will make it possible to search for a value in an array and then
runprev()
/next() on the array to get the next/previous sibling.I'd like to commit this after 5.2.4 has been released if there are no
objections?-Hannes
- In case it doesn't come through: http://home.nith.no/~maghan/
keeppos/<keeppos.patch