Just a heads up:
Both Pierre and myself have some bits and pieces that we'd like to do
to the openssl extension separate from the main source tree, pushing
releases via pecl, so I copied ext/openssl to pecl/openssl on the cvs
server.
These two areas are not symlinked because we want them to be isolated
from each other during development.
--Wez.
Why not just use a branch? Are you expecting this to come back to the
mainstream PHP distro?
-----Original Message-----
From: Wez Furlong [mailto:kingwez@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 6:09 PM
To: php-dev
Subject: [PHP-DEV] ext/openssl copied to pecl/opensslJust a heads up:
Both Pierre and myself have some bits and pieces that we'd
like to do to the openssl extension separate from the main
source tree, pushing releases via pecl, so I copied
ext/openssl to pecl/openssl on the cvs server.These two areas are not symlinked because we want them to be
isolated from each other during development.--Wez.
--
To
unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
Why not just use a branch? Are you expecting this to come back to the
mainstream PHP distro?
Yes, once our work is good enough for php-src, we will put (some) code
in php-src/ext/src. But we will play a lot with the api/implementation
before :)
You can see it like ext/zip, it is flexible for the developers
(complete freedom of commits in pecl) but is painless for the QA team
(they don't have to care about other branches than the PHP ones). It
is more work for us (W/P) but the benefits compensate the additional
work.
Regards,
--Pierre