I am considering changing the required arg storage type for 't' and 'T'
specifiers from void* to zstr*, since they can return either char* or
UChar* and the zstr union encapsulates both. Thoughts on this?
-Andrei
Hello Andrei,
yep, i think that would be much better :-)
only does it work under windows too?
best regards
marcus
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 7:35:27 PM, you wrote:
I am considering changing the required arg storage type for 't' and 'T'
specifiers from void* to zstr*, since they can return either char* or
UChar* and the zstr union encapsulates both. Thoughts on this?
I haven't heard complaints about zstr from Win32 users, so I guess it
does.
-Andrei
Hello Andrei,
yep, i think that would be much better :-)
only does it work under windows too?
best regards
marcusTuesday, July 18, 2006, 7:35:27 PM, you wrote:
I am considering changing the required arg storage type for 't' and
'T'
specifiers from void* to zstr*, since they can return either char* or
UChar* and the zstr union encapsulates both. Thoughts on this?
I agree.
I already use "zstr*" instead of (void**) in ext/soap code.
Dmitry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrei Zmievski [mailto:andrei@gravitonic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:35 PM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Dmitry Stogov; PHP Internals
Subject: Changing arg type for 't' and 'T' specifiersI am considering changing the required arg storage type for
't' and 'T'
specifiers from void* to zstr*, since they can return either char* or
UChar* and the zstr union encapsulates both. Thoughts on this?-Andrei