Is there any reson why this patch:
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/ext/standard/php_incomplete_class.h?r1=1.15&r2=1.16&ty=u
wasn't MFH'ed to older branches? I.e., was it done intentionally or it was
just an omission?
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115
It was MFHed to 5.1
Ilia
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Is there any reson why this patch:
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/ext/standard/php_incomplete_class.h?r1=1.15&r2=1.16&ty=u
wasn't MFH'ed to older branches? I.e., was it done intentionally or it
was just an omission?
IA>>It was MFHed to 5.1
Why not to 5.0?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115
IA>>It was MFHed to 5.1
Why not to 5.0?
5.0 is dead? :)
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:29:32 +0200 (CEST)
derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) wrote:
IA>>It was MFHed to 5.1
Why not to 5.0?
5.0 is dead? :)
5.1 is released? :)