Any objections to me applying this fix for the
unload-module-before-calling-object-dtors bug that I periodically
whine about?
--Wez.
At 08:18 06/03/2005, Wez Furlong wrote:
Any objections to me applying this fix for the
unload-module-before-calling-object-dtors bug that I periodically
whine about?
Is the diff available anywhere?
Zeev
It is/was attached to the mail I sent out; maybe gmail isn't so smart
with text attachments.
I've attached it to this mail, so you should get it this time.
--Wez.
At 08:18 06/03/2005, Wez Furlong wrote:
Any objections to me applying this fix for the
unload-module-before-calling-object-dtors bug that I periodically
whine about?Is the diff available anywhere?
Zeev
Wez Furlong wrote:
Hi Wez,
The diff is not attached. I think the mailling lists strip attachments?
Regards
--jm
It is/was attached to the mail I sent out; maybe gmail isn't so smart
with text attachments.I've attached it to this mail, so you should get it this time.
--Wez.
At 08:18 06/03/2005, Wez Furlong wrote:
Any objections to me applying this fix for the
unload-module-before-calling-object-dtors bug that I periodically
whine about?Is the diff available anywhere?
Zeev
Jacques Marneweck wrote:
I think the mailling lists strip attachments?
Attaching a file to this message to test the theory.