PSR-4 has been the community standard for autoloading namespaced classes
since 2014 and is used by virtually every modern PHP package via
Composer. However,
the actual autoloading still requires userspace code:
spl_autoload_register() with a closure or class method (almost always
generated by Composer) that performs prefix matching and
file_exists/require.
This RFC proposes adding a small set of native functions that allow the
engine itself to perform PSR-4 autoloading directly from registered prefix
→ base directory mappings. Package managers and applications can opt into
the faster, engine-native path instead of (or in addition to) registering a
userspace callback.
With emphasis on PSR-4 compliance, the engine implementation MUST follow
the PSR-4 specification exactly for prefix matching, relative path
construction, file extension (.php), and case sensitivity of the
terminating class name.
This can provide a performance improvement for PSR-4 heavy workloads by
eliminating userspace callback overhead.
To fully support PSR-4 autoloading I would propose a function
spl_autoload_psr4_register and complimenting functions.
Here is a proposed API.
/** * Register a PSR-4 namespace prefix → base directory mapping for native
engine autoloading. * * @param string $prefix Namespace prefix (trailing \
recommended; will be normalized) * @param string|array $baseDirs One base
directory (string) or list of base directories (array) * @param bool
$prepend Insert at front of search order (like spl_autoload_register) *
@return bool True on success */ function spl_autoload_psr4_register(string
$prefix, string|array $baseDirs, bool $prepend = false): bool {}
/** * Remove a previously registered PSR-4 prefix (and its base
directories). */ function spl_autoload_psr4_unregister(string $prefix):
bool {}
/** * Enable/disable the native PSR-4 fast path. When disabled, mappings
are kept but ignored. */ function spl_autoload_psr4_enable(bool $enable =
true): void {}
/** * Whether the native PSR-4 mechanism is currently active. */ function
spl_autoload_psr4_enabled(): bool {}
/** * Return current mappings as [prefix => [baseDir, ...], ...] preserving
registration order. */ function spl_autoload_psr4_get_mappings(): array {}
``` There would be no backwards compatibility issues and a simple
`function_exists('spl_autoload_psr4_register')` call would be used to
trigger use of the new functionality or fallback to userland callback
register.
Discussion points:
Should there be an `spl_autoload_psr4_enable(bool)` function to enable this
functionality or should the usage of `spl_autoload_psr4_register`
auto-enable the autoloader?
References
- PSR-4 Specification: https://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-4/ - PSR-4 Example
Implementations: https://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-4/examples/ - Old related
RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/splclassloader (declined, PSR-0 focused) -
Composer Autoloader class:
https://github.com/composer/composer/blob/main/src/Composer/Autoload/ClassLoader.php
----- This idea originally spawned from my idea to try an eliminate the
standard bootstrapping call of `include_once(__DIR__ .
'/vendor/autoload.php')` While this does not achieve this, i believe it can
be a good first step.
PSR-4 has been the community standard for autoloading namespaced classes
since 2014 and is used by virtually every modern PHP package via
Composer. However,
the actual autoloading still requires userspace code:
spl_autoload_register()with a closure or class method (almost always
generated by Composer) that performs prefix matching and
file_exists/require.This RFC proposes adding a small set of native functions that allow the
engine itself to perform PSR-4 autoloading directly from registered prefix
→ base directory mappings. Package managers and applications can opt into
the faster, engine-native path instead of (or in addition to) registering a
userspace callback.With emphasis on PSR-4 compliance, the engine implementation MUST follow
the PSR-4 specification exactly for prefix matching, relative path
construction, file extension (.php), and case sensitivity of the
terminating class name.
This can provide a performance improvement for PSR-4 heavy workloads by
eliminating userspace callback overhead.To fully support PSR-4 autoloading I would propose a function
spl_autoload_psr4_registerand complimenting functions.
I implemented a PECL extension doing pretty much this in https://github.com/
pprkut/autoload-psr, minus the complimenting functions.
I can't speak for performance benefits as I didn't do any benchmarks, I don't
think they'd be very noticeable though. My primary motivation for writing it
was to have an autoloader available from script start. The extension supports
PSR-0 as well, which fits even better (IMHO) with that workflow since it means
truly zero setup compared to PSR-4.
Anyway, perhaps have a look. At the very least it might serve as reference
point.
Grs,
Heinz
Le 16/07/2026 à 06:25, fennic log a écrit :
PSR-4 has been the community standard for autoloading namespaced
classes since 2014 and is used by virtually every modern PHP package
via Composer. However, the actual autoloading still requires userspace
code:spl_autoload_register()with a closure or class method (almost
always generated by Composer) that performs prefix matching and
file_exists/require.This RFC proposes adding a small set of native functions that allow
the engine itself to perform PSR-4 autoloading directly from
registered prefix → base directory mappings. Package managers and
applications can opt into the faster, engine-native path instead of
(or in addition to) registering a userspace callback.With emphasis on PSR-4 compliance, the engine implementation MUST
follow the PSR-4 specification exactly for prefix matching, relative
path construction, file extension (.php), and case sensitivity of
the terminating class name. This can provide a performance improvement
for PSR-4 heavy workloads by eliminating userspace callback overhead.To fully support PSR-4 autoloading I would propose a
functionspl_autoload_psr4_registerand complimenting functions.
Here is a proposed API./** * Register a PSR-4 namespace prefix → base directory mapping for native engine autoloading. * * @param string $prefix Namespace prefix (trailing \ recommended; will be normalized) * @param string|array $baseDirs One base directory (string) or list of base directories (array) * @param bool $prepend Insert at front of search order (like spl_autoload_register) * @return bool True on success */ function spl_autoload_psr4_register(string $prefix, string|array $baseDirs, bool $prepend = false): bool {} /** * Remove a previously registered PSR-4 prefix (and its base directories). */ function spl_autoload_psr4_unregister(string $prefix): bool {} /** * Enable/disable the native PSR-4 fast path. When disabled, mappings are kept but ignored. */ function spl_autoload_psr4_enable(bool $enable = true): void {} /** * Whether the native PSR-4 mechanism is currently active. */ function spl_autoload_psr4_enabled(): bool {} /** * Return current mappings as [prefix => [baseDir, ...], ...] preserving registration order. */ function spl_autoload_psr4_get_mappings(): array {} ``` There would be no backwards compatibility issues and a simple `function_exists('spl_autoload_psr4_register')` call would be used to trigger use of the new functionality or fallback to userland callback register. Discussion points: Should there be an `spl_autoload_psr4_enable(bool)` function to enable this functionality or should the usage of `spl_autoload_psr4_register` auto-enable the autoloader? References - PSR-4 Specification: https://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-4/ - PSR-4 Example Implementations: https://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-4/examples/ - Old related RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/splclassloader (declined, PSR-0 focused) - Composer Autoloader class: https://github.com/composer/composer/blob/main/src/Composer/Autoload/ClassLoader.php -----
I don't really see the advantage of having "spl_autoload_psr4_enable"
and "spl_autoload_psr4_enabled" functions: since there's a new
"spl_autoload_psr4_register" function, it means the feature should be
enabled by default, but registering PSR-4 namespaces is still opt-in.
Composer's autoloader might evolve in time to use it, but it can
internally detect PHP's version and dump the same autoloader as today
for current PHP versions, and dump a "new" autoloader for PHP versions
using built-in PSR-4 autoloading.
This idea originally spawned from my idea to try an eliminate the
standard bootstrapping call ofinclude_once(__DIR__ . '/vendor/autoload.php')While this does not achieve this, i believe
it can be a good first step.
If you're using Composer, built-in PSR-4 autoloading is a good start,
but in the end it won't be enough: Composer still supports PSR-0, and
supports custom files and classmaps. Adding built-in support for PSR-0
isn't necessarily useful (since it's supposed to have been deprecated
for a long time now), but custom classmaps could be interesting. A
function "spl_register_classmap_autoload(array $classmap, bool $prepend
= false)" function (or for single registrations with "string $class,
string $filepath" instead of an array, whatever) could also be used by
Composer in the future.
And by extrapolating, we can have more functions to replace the process
Composer goes on when generating a classmap with the "-o / --optimize"
option in the "dump-autoload" command and make the first run of a
process handling generate the classmap for certain registered psr4
namespaces and put them in cache (opcache, memcache, apcu...) (something
like "generate_psr4_classmap(string $nsPrefix)", or with the cache
backend's name like "opcache_generate_classmap_from_psr4(string
$nsPrefix)" ), so that further executions "just" fetch this classmap
cache from memory, thus enhancing built-in PSR-4 autoloading (just like
Composer's, but built-in, and classmap stored natively in memory instead
of the generated classmap file being stored in opcache and having to be
re-run). Benchmarks would be needed to check if built-in classmap would
be better than Composer's (so it implies a cache backend to check if
re-running the generated classmap is slower or not than a built-in
memory hashmap of classes and files), but it's feasible.
WDYT? Should an extrapolation of your suggestion make it to the core
too? (I personally think it should, either with this first RFC or with
further RFCs once this one is accepted)