Greetings all,
The
html_entity_decode( … ENT_HTML5 … )function has a number of issues that I’d like to correct.
- It’s missing 720 of HTML5’s specified named character references.
- 106 of these are named character references which do not require a trailing semicolon, such as
´- It’s unaware of the ambiguous ampersand rule, which allows these 106 in special circumstances.
HTML5 asserts that the list of named character references will not expand in the future. It can be found authoritatively at the following URL:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/entities.json
The ambiguous ampersand rule smoothes over legacy behavior from before HTML5 where ampersands were not properly encoded in attribute values, specifically in URL values. For example, in a query string for a search, one might find
?q=dog¬=cat. The¬in that value would decode to U+AC (¬), but since it’s in an attribute value it will be left as plaintext. Inside normal HTML markup it would transform into?q=dog¬=cat. There are related nuances when numeric character references are found at the end of a string or boundary without the semicolon.The function signature of
html_entity_decode()does not currently allow for correcting this behavior. I’d like to propose an RFC or a bug fix which either extends the function (perhaps by adding a new flag likeENT_AMBIGUOUS_AMPERSAND) or preferably creates a new function. For the missing character references I wonder if it would be enough to add them to the list of default translatable references.One challenge with the existing function is that the concept of the translation table stands in contrast with the fixed and static nature of HTML5’s replacement tables. A new function or set of functions could open up spec-compliant decoding while providing helpful methods that are necessary in many common server-side operations:
html_decode( ‘attribute’ | ‘data’, $raw_text, $input_encoding = ‘utf-8' )html_text_contains( ‘attribute’ | ‘data’, $raw_haystack, $needle, $input_encoding = ‘utf-8’ )html_text_starts_with( ‘attribute’ | ‘data’, $raw_haystack, $needle, $input_encoding = ‘utf-8’ )These methods are handy for inspecting things like encoded attribute values in a memory-efficient and processing-efficient way, when it’s not necessary to decode the entire value. In common situations, one encounters data-URIs with potentially megabytes of image data and processing only the first few or tens of bytes can save a lot of overhead.
We’re exploring pure-PHP solutions to these problems in WordPress in attempts to improve the reliability and safety of handling HTML. I’d love to hear your thoughts and know if anyone is willing to work with me to create an RFC or directly propose patches. We’ve created a step function which allows finding the next character reference and decoding it separately, enabling some novel features like highlighting the character references in source text.
Should I propose an RFC for this?
Warmly,
Dennis Snell
Automattic Inc.All,
I have submitted an RFC draft for including the proposed feature from this issue. Thanks to everyone who helped me in this process. It’s my first RFC, so I apologize in advance for any mistakes I’ve made in the process.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/decode_html
This is proposed for a future PHP version after 8.4.
Warmly,
Dennis Snell
Hey Dennis,
The RFC mentions that encoding must be utf-8. How are programmers supposed to work with this if the php file itself isn’t utf-8 or the input is meaningless in utf-8 or if changing it to utf-8 and back would result in invalid text?
— Rob