Hi internals,
I noticed that bcmod() behavior is a little different from what I expected.
First, look at the following code for bcdiv():
bcdiv('99', '100', 2); // '0.99'
So what should the following code be?
bcmod('99', '100', 2);
The result is '99.00'.
I was expecting '0.00' for this. I thought that if gave bcdiv() and bcmod() the exact same arguments, their results would not contradict each other.
To me this is unexpected behaviour, how do you think?
Regards,
Saki
Hi internals,
I noticed that
bcmod()behavior is a little different from what I expected.First, look at the following code for
bcdiv():bcdiv('99', '100', 2); // '0.99'So what should the following code be?
bcmod('99', '100', 2);The result is
'99.00'.
I was expecting'0.00'for this. I thought that if gavebcdiv()andbcmod()the exact same arguments, their results would not contradict each other.To me this is unexpected behaviour, how do you think?
Regards,
Saki
However, considering the behavior of fdiv() and fmod(), the current behavior of bcmod()may be correct and my thinking may be wrong...
Saki
Hi internals,
I noticed that
bcmod()behavior is a little different from what I expected.First, look at the following code for
bcdiv():bcdiv('99', '100', 2); // '0.99'So what should the following code be?
bcmod('99', '100', 2);The result is
'99.00'.
I was expecting'0.00'for this. I thought that if gavebcdiv()andbcmod()the exact same arguments, their results would not contradict each other.To me this is unexpected behaviour, how do you think?
Regards,
Saki
However, considering the behavior of
fdiv()andfmod(), the current behavior ofbcmod()may be correct and my thinking may be wrong...Saki
I was probably tired. Please forget about this thread...
Saki